IT is no secret that visa applications to the UK and Schengen countries come at a high cost. But recent published data on rejected visas for these countries reveals the sheer volume of refusals and the high costs faced by rejected applicants from developing countries.

In 2023, some 40pc of Pakistanis applying for UK and Schengen visas were rejected. They collectively paid a whopping £5.3m for failed visa applications to the UK and €3.344m for rejected Schengen visas.

This practice of charging exorbitant visa fees, in pounds or euros, for applications that are ultimately rejected is exploitative, and unfairly burdens applicants from poorer nations. The staggering rejection rates, too, underscore systemic biases in the largely non-transparent visa approval process. The policy effectively denies countless individuals the opportunity to travel for business, education, or personal reasons, while also extracting significant financial resources from them.

The comparison made by Lago Collective’s Marta Foresti illustrates this disparity: while an Italian can secure a visa on arrival in Sierra Leone for a mere £30, a Sierra Leonean must endure a lengthy, costly, and often futile application process to enter Italy.

Moreover, the recent hike in visa application fees, set to rise further, exacerbates matters. With Schengen visa fees increasing from €80 to €90 and UK fees from £100 to £120, the financial burden on applicants from countries with high rejection rates will only worsen. This is particularly egregious given that these fees are non-refundable, regardless of the application’s outcome. In 2023 alone, the UK collected £44m from rejected visa fees.

Though foreign missions understandably use these fees to fund their operations, their governments must address the blatant unfairness of an applicant paying in full for a visa that is rejected. Countries that set visa fees with a view to generating income and funding operations should re-evaluate the unfair burden it places on applicants who are denied entry.

Published in Dawn, June 17th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Trump 2.0
Updated 21 Jan, 2025

Trump 2.0

Few have forgotten how disruptive Trump could be as president. There has been little indication that his 2nd term will be any different.
GB’s status
21 Jan, 2025

GB’s status

THE demand raised by the people of Gilgit-Baltistan for constitutional clarity and provisional provincial status is...
Panda bond
Updated 21 Jan, 2025

Panda bond

ISLAMABAD’S plans to raise $200m from China’s capital markets through the inaugural issue of a Panda bond this...
At breaking point
Updated 20 Jan, 2025

At breaking point

The country’s jails serve as monuments to bureaucratic paralysis rather than justice.
Lower growth
20 Jan, 2025

Lower growth

THE IMF has slightly marked down its previous growth forecast for Pakistan’s economy from 3.2pc to 3pc for the...
Nutrition challenge
20 Jan, 2025

Nutrition challenge

WHEN a country’s children go hungry, its future withers. In Pakistan, where over 40pc of children under five are...