Banks’ profits

Published November 18, 2023

THE caretaker cabinet’s decision to retrospectively impose a one-off 40pc “windfall” tax on bank profits earned from their foreign exchange businesses in 2021 and 2022 would yield either “negligible” additional revenues in taxes for the government against its expectations of collecting Rs40bn from the measure, or end up punishing the banks. Although the provision to impose the windfall tax of up to 50pc on profits and gains arising from abrupt commodity prices, exchange gain etc was introduced under Section 99D of the Finance Act 2023 by the previous PML-N-led set-up in the budget for the present year, it refrained from implementing the decision in view of the heavy existing tax burden on the banks and other corporate entities. That the caretakers have chosen to target banks under this provision is unsurprising since they have reported a hefty profit of Rs110bn in the last two calendar years of 2021 and 2022 from the dollar trade. Besides, banks have in the recent past repeatedly been accused of making massive profits through speculative dollar trade and transactions in a highly volatile forex market, leading to large exchange rate depreciation. The SBP has already investigated and penalised the banks involved in the breach of its regulations on forex transactions.

With Section 99D of the Finance Act requiring that the further (windfall) tax should not exceed 50pc, the government stands to rake in maximum 3pc — nearly 11pc if super tax of 4pc/10pc is excluded — of further tax since the banks have already paid approximately 47pc effective tax, including super tax, on their forex income earned in the last two years. In case the government interprets the section differently and decides to collect 40pc as further tax, it will be like punishing the banks for being in this business by taking away almost entire profits on their forex transactions. Then, there is confusion around the definition of windfall profits, and the mechanism to segregate the forex income between recurring and windfall profits. Additionally, it is unclear who will compensate banks for the hit they took at the beginning of the present calendar year due to quick changes in the forex market. For these reasons many analysts expect the decision to be contested by banks. In any case, the banks are not going to produce more cash for the government, at least not without a good fight.

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

UAE’s Opec exit
Updated 30 Apr, 2026

UAE’s Opec exit

THE UAE’s exit from Opec is another sign of the major geopolitical shifts that are reshaping the global order. One...
Uncertain recovery
30 Apr, 2026

Uncertain recovery

PAKISTAN’S growth projections for the current fiscal present a cautiously hopeful picture, though geopolitical...
Police ‘encounters’
30 Apr, 2026

Police ‘encounters’

THE killing of nine suspects by Punjab’s Crime Control Department across Lahore, Sahiwal and Toba Tek Singh ...
Growth to stability
Updated 29 Apr, 2026

Growth to stability

THE State Bank’s decision to raise its key policy rate by 100 basis points to 11.5pc signals a shift in priorities...
Constitutional order
29 Apr, 2026

Constitutional order

FOLLOWING the passage of the 26th and 27th Amendments, in 2024 and 2025 respectively, jurists and members of the...
Protecting childhood
29 Apr, 2026

Protecting childhood

AN important victory for child protection was secured on Monday with the Punjab Assembly’s passage of the Child...