Banks’ profits

Published
0

THE caretaker cabinet’s decision to retrospectively impose a one-off 40pc “windfall” tax on bank profits earned from their foreign exchange businesses in 2021 and 2022 would yield either “negligible” additional revenues in taxes for the government against its expectations of collecting Rs40bn from the measure, or end up punishing the banks. Although the provision to impose the windfall tax of up to 50pc on profits and gains arising from abrupt commodity prices, exchange gain etc was introduced under Section 99D of the Finance Act 2023 by the previous PML-N-led set-up in the budget for the present year, it refrained from implementing the decision in view of the heavy existing tax burden on the banks and other corporate entities. That the caretakers have chosen to target banks under this provision is unsurprising since they have reported a hefty profit of Rs110bn in the last two calendar years of 2021 and 2022 from the dollar trade. Besides, banks have in the recent past repeatedly been accused of making massive profits through speculative dollar trade and transactions in a highly volatile forex market, leading to large exchange rate depreciation. The SBP has already investigated and penalised the banks involved in the breach of its regulations on forex transactions.

With Section 99D of the Finance Act requiring that the further (windfall) tax should not exceed 50pc, the government stands to rake in maximum 3pc — nearly 11pc if super tax of 4pc/10pc is excluded — of further tax since the banks have already paid approximately 47pc effective tax, including super tax, on their forex income earned in the last two years. In case the government interprets the section differently and decides to collect 40pc as further tax, it will be like punishing the banks for being in this business by taking away almost entire profits on their forex transactions. Then, there is confusion around the definition of windfall profits, and the mechanism to segregate the forex income between recurring and windfall profits. Additionally, it is unclear who will compensate banks for the hit they took at the beginning of the present calendar year due to quick changes in the forex market. For these reasons many analysts expect the decision to be contested by banks. In any case, the banks are not going to produce more cash for the government, at least not without a good fight.

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

Calling population growth a national emergency is easy. Ensuring that the response reaches the people who need it is the real challenge.
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...