ISLAMABAD: President Dr Arif Alvi used his discretion to appoint the Press Council of Pakistan (PCP) chairman, rejecting the advice of the then-prime minister. The stance was taken by the Presidency in response to a petition filed before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) by one of the aspirants for the position that had been vacant since July 2019.

The petitioner, Arshad Khan Jadoon, had challenged President Alvi’s “biased discretion” to reject the summary and PM’s advice and discard the entire selection exercise “on a mere whim”. Accor­ding to the Presidency, President Alvi had received PM’s advice for Mr Jadoon’s appointment as PCP chairman, despite the fact that the law makes it clear that president is the appointing authority.

The Presidency, in its reply submitted to the IHC, referred to Section 6 (1) of the PCP Ordinance 2002, that provides, “The Council shall consist of 19 members including the Chairman. The Chairman shall be appointed by the President of Pakistan in his person qualified to be judge of the Supreme Court.”

It said this legal provision “explicitly states that the chairman shall be appointed by the president in his discretion and not on the advice of the prime minister.” It said the president conducted interviews of three candidates including petitioner Jad­oon on Aug 8 and appointed Dr G.M. Chaudhry as PCP chairman finding him as the “most suitable candidate and the decision was conveyed to the prime minister.”

Former PCP chairman Salahuddin Mengal had completed his three-year tenure in July 2019. The process to appoint another chairman was initiated by the PTI government, but remained inconclusive. The PDM government then finalised names for and pay scale of the slot of PCP chairman. The then information minister Marriyum Aurangzeb approved a summary on Nov 1, 2022, and forwarded the names of three shortlisted candidates, along with the selection board’s assessment, to the PM Office.

The three shortlisted candidates were Mr Jadoon, Mohammad Akram Khaksar and Dr G.M. Chaudhry, all of them lawyers. According to the board’s assessment, 295 marks were awarded to Mr Jadoon, 278 to Mr Khaksar and 267 to Dr Chaudhry. After the president rejected the summary and board’s assessment, Mr Jadoon filed the petition through his counsel, arguing that he had served as chairman of the Implementation Tribunal of Newspapers Employees for two years and as deputy attorney general in 2015.

It informed the IHC that former PM Shehbaz Sharif had approved his name and forwarded it to President Alvi.

“It is a principle of law that an appointing authority does not have unfettered, unbridled, unregulated and biased discretion and in this particular case, the President ignored the advice of the PM, and discarded the entire selection exercise on a mere whim,” Mr Jadoon argued.

Published in Dawn, October 21st, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Running on empty
Updated 22 Mar, 2025

Running on empty

World Water Day should remind country’s rulers that water crisis threatens the very survival of our future generations.
Another ultimatum
22 Mar, 2025

Another ultimatum

THESE are fraught times, but the government must still find it in its heart to be a little more accommodating....
Muzzled voices
22 Mar, 2025

Muzzled voices

A NEW era of censorship is upon us. The FIA’s arrest of journalist and founder of media agency Raftar, Farhan...
Personal priorities
Updated 21 Mar, 2025

Personal priorities

Pet projects launched by govt often found to be poorly conceived, ripe for exploitation, misaligned with country’s overall development priorities.
Inheritance rights
21 Mar, 2025

Inheritance rights

THE Federal Shariat Court’s ruling that it is un-Islamic to deprive a woman of her right to inheritance is a...
Anti-Muslim actions
21 Mar, 2025

Anti-Muslim actions

MUSLIMS in India have endured incessant scrutiny of their nationalism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ...