Brutalising society

Published
0

THE Senate Standing Committee on Interior passed a bill last week with a majority vote that favoured the public hangings of rapists — a move that was condemned by the PPP as well as the interior and foreign affairs ministries. Proposed by a Jamaat-i-Islami senator, the bill seeks to amend certain sections of the Pakistan Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code to legalise public executions.

This is a disturbing development. Since the rape and murder of young Zainab Ansari in 2018, the call for public hangings has intensified. The idea has been encouraged by many well-known figures, with Imran Khan endorsing it when he was prime minister. The parties and organisations criticising the vote rightly point out that executions do not act as deterrents, and that carrying out capital punishment in city squares is going to further brutalise a society already steeped in violence. Those who support public executions are allowing their emotions to gain the upper hand — or playing to the gallery. The reality is that executions — including public ones — do not improve the criminal justice system. In this context, the PPP’s Sherry Rehman was right to indicate that crime, even after former military dictator Ziaul Haq’s introduction of punishments administered in view of the public, did not come down and, in fact, increased “barbarism and violence”. The anger at the growing violence and sexual crimes against women is understandable. But it should find an outlet in better funding for police, improved criminal investigations and solid training for officers investigating rape. Instead, public emotions are whipped up by calling for executions when the nation is overcome by horror. This paper has consistently criticised the death penalty, and the fact that many of our lawmakers now want to implement this sentence in city squares is extremely worrying. Mr Khan once remarked that he would legalise the public hanging of rapists, but that the international community would not view it kindly as it goes against their human rights principles. Such statements are not focused on justice, but on the idea of immediate revenge, which means they do not yield any positive result in the long term. Our lawmakers should look at the flaws in our justice system when deliberating on such important matters, and not let emotions or the need to appease the public get in their way.

Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Lagging behind
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

Lagging behind

The immediate task is to contain inflation and protect vulnerable households without reviving unsustainable subsidies or excessive demand.
India voter purge
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

India voter purge

Earlier, the BJP and its Hindutva cohorts could get away with trampling the rights of Indian Muslims, but now their shenanigans are not working.
Multan derailment
15 Oct, 2026

Multan derailment

IN numerous states, including many of Pakistan’s neighbours, rail transport is a safe and affordable mode of...
Narrative confusion
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Narrative confusion

The centre must say clearly how long it intends it to last, what it hopes to achieve in that time, and how the province’s elected mandate will be restored.
El Niño’s long reach
14 Oct, 2026

El Niño’s long reach

THE extraordinary El Niño gathering strength in the Pacific could make 2026 the hottest year on record, with 2027...
Deeper poverty
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Deeper poverty

PAKISTAN’S poverty crisis is far deeper than official indicators suggest. While the government celebrates economic...