“PAKISTAN is prepared to accept the condition that Indian troops should withdraw from Kashmir after the tribesmen have withdrawn. But withdraw they must.” This declaration was made by Sir Mohammad Zafrullah Khan, Pakistan Foreign Minister, at a Press conference on Wednesday [Sept 8] when he gave a brilliant 90-minute exposition of Pakistan’s case in the Kashmir dispute. While he tore Pandit Nehru’s arguments to pieces, Sir Zafrullah refused to emulate the former’s language.

Explaining why India objected to withdrawal of its troops from Kashmir, the Foreign Minister said that Pandit Nehru was today convinced that any plebiscite held under impartial authority in Kashmir would go against his country. That was the reason why he insisted that the plebiscite should be held under Abdullah’s authority and only “the observation” of the United Nations. And Nehru wanted the Indian troops to remain in Kashmir to terrorise the people from expressing their free will. That was why India refused to withdraw her troops even after the tribesmen and Pakistan troops had withdrawn.

Published in Dawn, September 9th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

New regional order
Updated 11 May, 2026

New regional order

The fact is that the US has only one true security commitment in the Middle East — Israel.
A better start
11 May, 2026

A better start

THE first 1,000 days of a child’s life often shape decades to come. In Pakistan, where chronic malnutrition has...
Widening gap
11 May, 2026

Widening gap

PAKISTAN’S monthly trade deficit ballooned to $4.07bn last month, its highest level since June 2022, further...
Momentary relief
Updated 10 May, 2026

Momentary relief

THE IMF’s approval of the latest review of Pakistan’s ongoing Fund programme comes at a moment of growing global...
India’s global shame
10 May, 2026

India’s global shame

INDIA’s rabid streak is at an all-time high. Prejudice is now an organised movement to erase religious freedoms ...
Aurat March restrictions
Updated 10 May, 2026

Aurat March restrictions

The message could not have been clearer: women may gather, but only if they remain politically harmless.