Politicising the judiciary

Published
0

THE flames from the PML-N and PTI’s political war are now consuming all branches of the state, pushing the country towards unprecedented chaos.

The judiciary has become the latest battleground between the two factions, with senior justices, whether they realise it or not, now being seen as pieces on a chessboard, to be moved or removed as the players see fit.

More salvos have been fired from London and Lahore, with PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif blaming the apex court for all of the country’s troubles post-2017, and the PTI chief accusing his rival party of “threatening” the Supreme Court along the lines of what it did in 1997 to silence former chief justice Sajjad Ali Shah. Both sides have exhorted their supporters to ‘come out’ and ‘take a stand’ in their favour, increasing fears of clashes on the streets.

The incumbent government and its sympathisers are spinning their sudden interest in the Supreme Court’s affairs as a long overdue effort to reform its ‘practices and procedures’.

It is increasingly looking like a very thin façade. There has been a parallel, ongoing effort to paint certain judges as being ‘sympathetic’ to Imran Khan and the PTI, which has been countered dutifully by the latter’s supporters with attacks against judges being seen as ‘sympathetic’ to the PML-N.

This war of words has taken an increasingly ugly form, and there are now open attacks on even the families of sitting and retired Supreme Court justices, who are accused of influencing court decisions with their personal political preferences.

It may be noted that recently published remarks attributed to retired army chief Gen Bajwa, in which he insinuated that the country’s top judges are swayed in their decisions by their spouses’ sympathies for the PTI chief, are what seem to have triggered this line of commentary.

While Nawaz Sharif and the PML-N may rightly feel they were hard done by, by the top court with its judgements in 2017, sitting abroad and bringing the judiciary’s integrity into question with insinuations of its partiality is not the solution. With the PML-N in government, Mr Sharif can return to the country and make his case from here.

But he must realise that even if his party’s efforts are somehow successful in securing him a clean chit from the courts while he remains abroad, he will still need to return to the people of Pakistan if he wishes to rule this country again.

He cannot expect their sympathies to change overnight, given the crude manner in which his government keeps trying to assert itself.

It defies understanding how the PML-N expects public vindication if it is blocking the electoral process, resorting to state high-handedness, failing in economic management and upending the Constitution while trying to achieve it.

Published in Dawn, April 3rd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...
Climate challenges
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Climate challenges

Pakistan cannot afford to confront its climate crises one disaster, one season and one international summit at a time.
Under fire
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Under fire

KP police are increasingly vulnerable as they play a frontline role in ongoing operations against terrorists.
Used car imports
13 Nov, 2026

Used car imports

THE government’s effort to restrict used car imports appears to be faltering. So suggest the numbers. Despite...