KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday extended till Dec 7 its earlier interim restraining order for K-Electric from collecting the controversial Municipal Utility Charges and Taxes (MUCT) on behalf of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through electricity bills.

A division bench headed by Justice Nadeem Akhtar also directed the KMC to file comments on one of the two petitions till the next date of hearing.

Earlier, the bench had appointed former attorney generals Khalid Jawed Khan and Munir A. Malik as amici curiae to assist the court on the subject issue and the former appeared before the bench on Tuesday and advanced his opinion.

Barrister Khan submitted that there was a need to examine the relevant laws of KMC and KE.

An additional advocate general supported the stance of KMC.

The SHC was petitioned against the provincial government’s move to outsource the collection of the MUCT to the KE and on Sept 26, the bench through an interim order had restrained the power utility from collecting the tax through electricity bills.

Advocate Syed Najeebuddin Ahmed had moved the SHC in April while city chief of Jamaat-i-Islami Hafiz Naeem-ur-Rehman and other party leaders petitioned the SHC in September impugning the collection of MUCT through the power bills.

Petition dismissed as infructuous

Another SHC bench headed by Justice Mohammad Karim Agha dismissed a petition of former Muttahida Qaumi Movement lawmaker Kunwar Khalid Yunus against his detention order issued under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance.

The petitioner, through his lawyer Shaukat Hayat, filed the petition last month stating that the provincial home department had passed an order in April about his arrest and detention under the MPO on fabricated accusation of his alleged association with the MQM-London.

The petitioner submitted that he was 78-year-old and suffering from multiple diseases and completely confined to bed and the impugned order was issued in violation of the fundamental rights as guaranteed under Articles 9 and 10 of the Constitution.

A provincial law officer submitted that the impugned notification had now been expired and was no longer in the field. A statement filed on the behalf of the home department said that the notification was issued on April 8 for 90 days and it expired on July 7.

Published in Dawn, November 23rd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...