Experts differ on water works

Published December 27, 2005

ISLAMABAD, Dec 26: The Technical Committee on Water Resources (TCWR) has failed to reach a consensus on major irrigation issues, including construction of future dams and their sequencing, total water availability and filling criteria of dams.

“I apologize that a consensus could not be reached in the preparation of this report,” wrote TCWR’s Chairman A.N.G. Abbasi when he submitted the final report to President Gen Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz in August this year. The committee would stand dissolved on Dec 31. The report was exclusively provided to Dawn by sources in the water and power ministry.

The committee asked the government to immediately start proceedings for signing of a water treaty with Afghanistan to protect Pakistan’s lower riparian rights as many international agencies were helping Afghanistan to construct dams on rivers flowing into Pakistan.

The nine-member committee seemed clearly divided over most of the issues. Seven members of the committee, comprising six members from Punjab, the NWFP and Balochistan and Dr Iqbal Ali from Sindh, adopted more or less a uniform set of arguments.

TCWR’s Chairman A.N.G. Abbasi and Sindh member Sardar Ahmad Mughal have taken a different stand on most of the issues, including computations about water availability, its utilisation by the provinces and future dams.

The group of seven members has adopted a Wapda estimate that Afghanistan could not use more than 500,000 acre feet of its water from rivers coming into Pakistan, while the chairman and Sindh member Sardar Ahmad Mughal questioned the estimate. Mr Mughal estimated that Afghanistan could use up to four million acre feet of water from Kabul river.

Similarly, the group of seven has estimated that India could be restricted to use only two MAF of western rivers for developing their remaining area. The chairman of the TCWR has termed it unrealistic and refered to presentation of Pakistan Commissioner for Indus Waters that listed violations by India of even the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960. By comparison, Sardar Mughal has put the figure at 4.8 MAF.

Notwithstanding, the difference of opinion among the members of the committee, most of them were unanimous about protecting the existing provincial water uses. The report presented a classic example of diverging views among the country’s irrigation experts and engineers on irrigation issues, including construction of future dams but could be used as one of the best reference books to understand water issues in the country.

The TCWR chairman also documented hurdles many quarters tried to create in preparation of the report that led to his tendering his resignation twice in the process. It is interesting to note that many members tried to persuade the chairman TCWR to present “a one-page report” in the very beginning of the proceedings of the report.

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...
Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...