SC to hear FBR appeal against SHC decision on phone call levy

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court accepted for hearing on Thursday an appeal filed by the Federal Bureau of Revenue (FBR) against a Sindh High Court order of Oct 18 last year which had set aside the levy of a 75 paise federal excise duty (FED) on every phone call over five minutes in duration.

Headed by Justice Qazi Faez Isa, a three-judge SC bench granted leave to appeal and ordered clubbing together of all identical petitions and fixing them for hearing within one month.

Others on the bench are Justice Yayha Afridi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel.

The case involves levy of excise duty on the telecom sector imposed as federal excise duty at a rate of 75 paise per call if it exceeds five minutes by inserting Clause 6A in Table 11 of the 1st Schedule of the Federal Excise Act 2005 through Finance Act 2021-2022.

Initially, three mobile companies — Telenor Pakistan (Pvt) Limited, Pak Telecom Mobile Ltd and Pakistan Communications Ltd — had challenged the amendment into the Finance Act on different grounds. One of them was that the Constitution’s 18th Amendment had vested the powers of taxation on services in the provinces. They relied on a judgement of the Sindh High Court which had accepted the contentions of mobile companies.

Being an aggrieved party, the FBR challenged the SHC judgement in the Supreme Court through its counsel Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar.

The FBR counsel argued before the apex court that the law relating to imposition of excise duties on telecom companies was amended and inserted by Parliament through Finance Act 2021-2022, as in Clause 6A in Table 11 of the First Schedule of the Federal Excise Act 2005.

Parliament is legally competent and authorised under Article 73 of the Constitution to legislate on any federal subject, the petitioner contended.

The Sindh High Court had ignored the fact that “excise duty” has been mentioned as entry No 44 of Part 1 in the Fourth Schedule, the FBR said. “The (SHC) judgement is not legally maintainable and requires to be set aside.”

The counsel argued that the Federal Excise Act was applicable throughout the country and the Sindh High Court was not justified in making redundant the provisions introduced through the amended Finance Act 2021-2022.

The three mobile companies suggested that all the petitions be clubbed together since identical matters were pending with the apex court.

Published in Dawn, September 30th, 2022

Editorial

Blue wave
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

Blue wave

While Trump does not usually learn from his errors, perhaps seeing the response of the American voters he may attempt a wiser course.
New LPG policy
05 Nov, 2026

New LPG policy

EACH winter, millions of working-class households across the country face the same ordeal. LPG, long considered the...
Polio’s other victims
05 Nov, 2026

Polio’s other victims

FOR decades, Pakistan has vowed to eradicate polio. Billions have been spent on logistics and awareness drives. Yet...
Electoral reform
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Electoral reform

The real problem is the gulf between the statute book and what happens on polling day, not the laws.
Competing demands
04 Nov, 2026

Competing demands

THE climate crisis is becoming harder to confront as the world develops new ways to consume scarce resources. At an...
Belated meeting
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Belated meeting

Whether it is Imran Khan, his family members, or other incarcerated political leaders and activists, the state should not deny them their rights.