Minister’s allegations

Published June 19, 2022

WHEN high-stakes political interests are involved, then a multimillion pound secret is unlikely to remain under wraps for long. So it has proved in the case of the £190m settlement that the UK-based National Crime Agency arrived at in December 2019 with property tycoon and owner of Bahria Town Ltd Malik Riaz, details of which were contained in a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).

At a presser on Tuesday, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah spilled the beans on the NDA. Further, he accused former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi of accepting Rs5bn and huge tracts of land from Bahria to “provide protection” to the real estate firm in the money laundering case.

As a result of efforts by Shahzad Akbar, the then PM’s aide on accountability and allegedly tasked by Mr Khan to resolve the matter, the NDA that was arrived at in the UK provided for the humongous amount to be adjusted against Mr Riaz’s civil liability in Pakistan. (The latter refers to Bahria’s offer of Rs460bn, accepted by the Supreme Court in March 2019, to settle the case pertaining to the firm’s illegal acquisition of land in Karachi.)

According to the interior minister, a parallel agreement was also executed closer to home whereby land measuring 458 kanals with an official value of Rs530m was transferred to a trust owned by the ousted premier and his spouse. Another 240 kanals was, he said, transferred to Farah Shehzadi, reportedly a friend of Bushra Bibi. The federal cabinet has formed a sub-committee to investigate the matter and deal with it according to the law.

Read: Malik Riaz’s family regrets release of ‘confidential’ deal

The allegations made in the press conference are extremely serious and must of course be probed. The saga of the NCA’s settlement with Mr Riaz — specifically how the Pakistani state was seen to go out of its way to ensure a favourable outcome for the well-connected property tycoon — is a sordid one, even without taking the recent ‘revelations’ into account.

It is mind-boggling how even fundamental requirements of justice were flouted in the process of favouring an individual. Consider that the NDA, brokered by the state, allowed members of his family holding UK bank accounts that had been frozen for containing the suspected ‘proceeds of crime’, to pay the contents of those accounts “at [their] sole discretion” towards Bahria’s existing civil debt. Can one even expect that beyond political vendetta against the ousted prime minister, the present government will seek to right this injustice?

Published in Dawn, June 19th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Lawless city
22 Sep, 2023

Lawless city

A GRIM milestone has just been passed in Karachi. The recent death of a teenage robbery victim brings the number of...
Another Sharif trip
22 Sep, 2023

Another Sharif trip

THE sudden arrival of former prime minister Shehbaz Sharif in London, a mere 48 hours after he touched down in...
Delayed elections
Updated 22 Sep, 2023

Delayed elections

If ECP wishes to affirm that it is serious, it should start moving on all pending matters so that the possibility of any further delay is minimised.
What next?
Updated 21 Sep, 2023

What next?

One wonders that if administrative measures were all that were needed to arrest the rupee’s sorry slide, why were they not taken sooner?
Greater representation
21 Sep, 2023

Greater representation

PAKISTAN now stands at a significant juncture, with the names of 11.7m more women added to the voter list, ...
Lost generations
21 Sep, 2023

Lost generations

IF those who wield power in Pakistan think that the nation can progress when tens of millions of its children have...