ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday observed that parliament had inherent powers to legislate and sought further arguments on a petition seeking to set aside recent amendments to the Elections Act to decide its maintainability.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed that amendments to the Elections Act made by the incumbent government had not deprived overseas Pakistanis of their right to vote in general elections.

He advised the petitioner to have faith in parliament as it was the supreme legislative institution of the country which should be respected.

The petitioner, an advocate, contended that the previous government had given the right of vote to overseas Pakistan, but recent amendments to the Elections Act had deprived them of this right.

Justice Minallah remarked that no law had deprived the overseas Pakistan their right to vote in the general elections, adding that it was a complicated issue.

He inquired from the petitioner whether about 9 million overseas Pakistanis would cast their votes in a single constituency.

He asked the petitioner to elaborate as to how the dual national Pakistanis cast their votes in the US presidential elections.

The petitio­ner was, however, unable to respond to the question and he was not aware of the US voting mechanism.

Justice Minallah said that law did not exclude overseas Pakistanis, but the mechanism for casting the votes was yet to be finalised.

The petitioner, however, insisted on his point and said that the Supreme Court’s three-member bench had directed the Election Commission of Pakistan to devise a system for overseas Pakistanis to vote in the general elections.

The court reminded him that the parliament had restored the original section of the Elections Act about overseas Pakistanis’ voting rights, and through the recent amendment the parliament had further elaborated the modes operandi for voting by overseas Pakistanis.

Justice Minallah observed that prima facie the previous amendm­ent was not in consonance with the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court.

The IHC chief justice remarked that the court was not mandated to settle the criteria for overseas Pakis­tanis’ voting as it was the responsibility of relevant institutions.

The court adjourned the hearing till June 3.

Published in Dawn, June 2nd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...
Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...