ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday issued a stay order on the transfer of the suspended director news and two other senior officials of the state-run PTV to the far-flung area of Turbat, Balochistan, by the previous government.

Suspended Director News Rashid Baig and reporting head Shahid Ajmal Malik from the PTV’s Islamabad centre and Purchase Officer Nasir Hussain from the Quetta office were transferred to the PTV booster in Turbat on March 4.

The channel’s administration had stated in the transfer letter that “PTV’s transmission is being broadcast in the southern border of Pakistan efficiently through RBS of this area. However, employees of this region have never been developed/trained to understand the dynamics of local inhabitants and their amalgamation into the Pakistani narrative.

In order to identify the fault lines/issues/propagation of CPEC being confronted in these areas and translate/project them in its true perspective, integrate it in the government narrative, a team comprising senior officials has been constituted to be stationed at strategic location i.e. RBS Turbat to undertake in-depth analysis of the area dynamics/physical demography/develop contents, especially with regards to CPEC and train employees of all RBSs of the southern belt.”

Mr Baig had challenged in the high court the appointments in PTV made by the previous regime of PTI at key news, financial and administrative positions. Resultantly, he was suspended and then transferred from the news department and posted to RBS Turbat along with two other senior officials.

Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb of the IHC resumed hearing of the petition. The same court had earlier this month issued an interim restraining order against the said transfers.

Baig’s counsel Shahid Mehmood Khokhar informed the court that the PTV management victimised his client and transferred him to the Turbat booster where only a technician was working to look after the system.

The PTV, on the other hand, in a reply submitted before the court maintained that the appointments were made in accordance with the law and with due deliberations. The law ministry’s opinion was also sought prior to making the said appointments, it claimed.

Published in Dawn, April 28th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

De-escalation efforts
23 Jul, 2026

De-escalation efforts

WHILE the exchange of fire across the Gulf — and the wider Middle East — continues between the US and Iran,...
Time to integrate
23 Jul, 2026

Time to integrate

PAKISTAN remains one of the least regionally integrated economies in Asia. The trade figures for the last fiscal ...
Modi unnerved
23 Jul, 2026

Modi unnerved

DISCONTENT is visible in India. Delhi has been on the boil since last month. As thousands took to the streets ...
Frozen Award
Updated 22 Jul, 2026

Frozen Award

KP’S petition before the Federal Constitutional Court, seeking Rs964bn as the province’s claimed share of tax...
Delayed pricing
22 Jul, 2026

Delayed pricing

THE ongoing delay in making new, approved lifesaving medicines available to patients is a serious lapse in...
Joint prayers
22 Jul, 2026

Joint prayers

IN a country which has witnessed monstrous bouts of sectarian violence, even symbolic gestures by clerics belonging...