‘Divided’ JCP okays Justice Ayesha Malik’s nomination to Supreme Court

Published January 7, 2022
A file photo of Justice Ayesha A. Malik. — Dawn
A file photo of Justice Ayesha A. Malik. — Dawn

ISLAMABAD: A divided Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) on Thursday made history by approving the nomination of the first woman judge to enter the Supreme Court.

Lahore High Court Justice Ayesha A. Malik’s nomination was secured by a majority of five to four during a heated JCP session that lasted nearly three-and-a-half hours.

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Gulzar Ahmed, senior puisne judge Justice Umar Ata Bandial, former judge Sarmad Jalal Osmany, Law Minister Barrister Farogh Naseem and Attorney General (AG) Khalid Jawed Khan supported Justice Malik’s candidature — who is fourth in the seniority list of the Lahore High Court.

However, Justice Qazi Faez Isa, Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) representative Akhtar Hussain opposed the selection.

If she is elevated following approval from an eight-member bipartisan parliamentary committee, Justice Malik will remain a judge of the Supreme Court until March 2031, and may even have a chance to become the first woman to be chief justice of Pakistan.

Conceding to the demand for an appointment criteria for the nomination of judges to the superior courts, the JCP also decided to constitute a committee to deal with the matter, which is expected to meet soon after it is notified.

It is worth noting that on Sept 9, 2021, the JCP did not reach a decision on whether to nominate Justice Malik or not. Four of the eight members; Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, former judge Dost Mohammad Khan and PBC representative Akhtar Hussain had opposed the idea of her appointment to the apex court, whereas the CJP, Justice Bandial, Farogh Naseem and the attorney general weighed in, in her favour. At the time, Justice Isa was out of the country and therefore could not attend the meeting.

Despite the strike call issued by the PBC — which had earlier announced its opposition to Justice Malik’s proposed elevation — the protest by lawyers was quite muted and very unlike the earlier protest by the legal fraternity on Sept 9. In fact, cases continued to be heard in routine at the Supreme Court as well as the Lahore and Islamabad high courts.

Criteria or elevation

At the outset of the meeting on Thursday, Justice Isa read out the letters he had earlier written to the CJP, highlighting the need to first determine the appointment criteria for the nomination of judges to the top court, rather than considering Justice Malik’s elevation.

Once the nomination and selection criteria are determined, Justice Isa suggested, this would help dispel misgivings that arbitrariness holds sway in the selection process, adding that Rule 3 of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules 2010 only meant that the nominees be routed through the concerned chief justices, not that the concerned chief justices alone may nominate them.

Both Justice Baqar and Justice Masood backed the idea of developing a criteria first and voted against the nomination, but former judge Osmany was of the view that after having gone through all relevant judgments of the Supreme Court, especially the 1996 Al-Jihad Trust case verdict, Justice Malik was indeed the most deserving to be elevated as a judge of the apex court.

Reaction from the legal community

Talking to reporters after the sitting, Law Minister Farogh Naseem said the appointment was made on merit and hoped that the nomination would also receive a nod from the parliamentary committee soon.

The attorney general also wished Justice Malik all the best, but Sindh High Court Bar Association President Salahuddin Ahmed expressed his disappointment over the move. “Though it was wonderful to see a woman elevated to the Supreme Court, it is however deeply disappointing to see the JCP still remains resistant to framing any objective evaluation criteria for appointing judges and refuses to introduce any rules to check their discretion in this regard.”

He added that this did not bode well for the six appointments that would be made to the Supreme Court this year.

In a related development, Lahore High Court Bar Association President Maqsood Buttar moved a petition before the Supreme Court seeking directions that the JCP invite all relevant stakeholders; judges, senior lawyers and bar representatives, members of the parliamentary committee, the federal and provincial governments and civil society and structure the process of judicial appointments to the superior courts to make them more objective and transparent.

The petition also sought directions for the JCP to frame comprehensive and detailed rules/guidelines to structure both the process of and parameters for appointment.

The petition had also asked that until the criteria was developed, the JCP should stick to the seniority principle in the elevation of high court judges to the Supreme Court.

Justice Malik: a brief profile

Justice Malik completed her early education from schools in Paris and New York and then completed her senior Cambridge from the Karachi Grammar School.

She studied law at the Pakistan College of Law in Lahore and went on to do her LLB from the Harvard Law School Cambridge, Massachusetts USA, where she was named a London H Gammon fellow 1998-1999.

From 2001 to the date of her elevation as a high court judge, she worked with the law firm of Rizvi, Isa, Afridi and Angell, first as a senior associate and then a partner in charge of the firm’s Lahore office.

Justice Malik has appeared as a pro-bono counsel for several NGOs working on poverty alleviation, micro finance and skills-training programmes.

She is also author of a number of publications and has taught banking law at University of the Punjab and mercantile law at the College of Accounting and Management Sciences Karachi.

Published in Dawn, January 7th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Untruths and politics
Updated 01 Oct, 2022

Untruths and politics

It would arguably be in the national interest for the Supreme Court to take up the cipher and settle the matter.
Farmers’ protest
01 Oct, 2022

Farmers’ protest

SEVERAL hundred farmers have converged on Islamabad for the last three days to protest against the soaring costs of...
Dasht-i-Barchi bombing
01 Oct, 2022

Dasht-i-Barchi bombing

ON Friday morning, Kabul’s Dasht-i-Barchi neighbourhood was rocked by a terrorist attack targeting an educational...
Avenfield relief
Updated 30 Sep, 2022

Avenfield relief

Accountability cannot continue to be treated like a revolving door in which politicians can be shoved in or pulled out on a whim.
Dar’s plans
Updated 30 Sep, 2022

Dar’s plans

For starters, the country doesn’t have spare dollars to burn.
Another targeted attack
30 Sep, 2022

Another targeted attack

WEDNESDAY’S deadly attack on three Chinese-origin individuals in Karachi’s Saddar area demonstrates the threat...