THIS is with reference to the article ‘Documentary: the causes of the secession’ (ICON, Dec 26) about Javed Jabbar’s documentary Separation of East Pakistan — The Untold Story wherein the Quaid-i-Azam has been shown announcing that Urdu would be the national language of both East and West Pakistan, and it was categorised as a miscalculation. The Quaid would never have made such an assertion without having given it a lot of thought. To call his decision a miscalculation, in my opinion, is a fallacy.

There is hardly any country that has achieved greatness having more than one national language. Although in our part of the world, religion has priority; many great nations have several religions, but are held together by one language. The United States has Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Hindus, Muslims and what not, but they are bound together by one language; English.

The British ruled the subcontinent using the divide et impera policy, but then they overdid it and paid the price. They had Hindu universities and Muslim universities; Hindu law and Muslim law; Hindu tea and Muslim tea and even Hindu paani and Muslim paani at railway stations. However, when the rulers started associating Urdu with the Muslim community and Hindi with the Hindus, they inadvertently alerted everyone to the possibility of two nations living in a single geographical entity. Muslims across the subcontinent began taking Urdu seriously, and its Arabic script helped. All ‘educated’ Muslims began reading and speaking Urdu. Unfortunately, however, 90 per cent of Muslims were still illiterate.

In 1947, Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy, Khawaja Nazimuddin, Wali Khan, G.M. Syed, Ghulam Mohammad, Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, and everyone else regardless of their individual linguistic backgrounds, were all well-versed in Urdu. They were not ‘Urdu-speaking’ — the term was not invented yet — but they spoke Urdu fairly well without inhibition.

Had ‘education’ been given top priority, we would never have had a language controversy. Gradually but surely, all Pakistanis would have spoken and read one language at home, in school and college, in the cities and the suburbs. It might have taken time, but with a little perseverance it would have happened. That, in my opinion, was the Quaid-i-Azam’s vision. It definitely was not a miscalculation. Alas! The Quaid passed away a little too soon.

Capt Afaq Rizvi
Karachi

Published in Dawn, January 4th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...