Guantánamo torture

Published
4

THE story of Majid Khan, a Pakistani Guantánamo Bay prisoner sentenced for links to Al Qaeda, is a harrowing one. This month, Khan became the first person to make a public statement about the torture he endured after being detained in the wake of the Sept 11 attacks. In a 39-page statement, he described being tortured in Pakistan, Afghanistan and another country following his capture in Karachi in March 2003. Khan told the sentencing jury, who is now urging clemency for the detainee, that he was raped, beaten and water-boarded by CIA interrogators. The jury members who sentenced Khan have called his torture by the CIA a “stain” on America. Khan’s ordeal is unfortunately a reality shared by countless other detainees who have faced the worst of the CIA’s ruthless and demeaning interrogation techniques — tactics that in most jurisdictions are illegal and have time and again yielded nothing but contempt for the US. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, former US president George W. Bush said the CIA had saved lives by using “enhanced interrogation techniques”, a euphemism for torture which includes sleep deprivation, slapping, and subjecting detainees to cold and simulated drowning. The recent case of Palestinian Gitmo detainee Abu Zubaydah, too, has brought attention to Washington’s torture programme – something which the US government for years has kept hidden citing the state secrets privilege.

The truth is that the CIA’s torture programme was very much a playbook followed by its contractors both in black sites across the world where detainees were kept and then later at Guantánamo. This prison at an American naval base in Cuba was created at a time when the US was reeling from the Sept 11 attacks and had somehow justified torture as an interrogation method, with the prison serving as an alternative jurisdiction where mainland court rules didn’t apply. Former president Obama had tried to shut down the site, and had famously admitted that, “in the dark halls of Abu Ghraib and the detention cells of Guantánamo, we [the US] have compromised our most precious values”. Yet, it still exists today, eating up millions of dollars each year and standing as an edifice that contradicts America’s much-touted commitment to human rights. This programme begins in a vacuum where rights, such as a fair trial or humane conditions, cease to exist. The very existence of Gitmo in this day and age is indeed a stain on America’s democracy and human rights record.

Published in Dawn, November 4th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Need for dialogue
06 Aug, 2026

Need for dialogue

THE interior minister’s comments at an Islamabad seminar last week have sparked many a conversation about the ...
Bad press
06 Aug, 2026

Bad press

THE government’s move to impose restrictions on international media will not only alienate the foreign press, it...
Automobile concerns
06 Aug, 2026

Automobile concerns

PAKISTAN’S automobile industry is at a critical juncture. Sharp cuts in tariffs on the import of completely built...
State of confusion
Updated 05 Aug, 2026

State of confusion

FROM the looks of it, America has no exit strategy to extricate itself from the disastrous war with Iran. US...
Pension decision
05 Aug, 2026

Pension decision

THE government’s decision to formally operationalise the new Defined Contribution Pension Fund Scheme is a step...
Preventable deaths
05 Aug, 2026

Preventable deaths

THE deaths of 144 children from measles and diphtheria in Karachi during the first seven months of the year expose a...