Easing the pressure?

Published October 29, 2021

SHORT-TERM Saudi loans always come in handy for our rulers — be they from the PML-N or PTI — when there is financial trouble. Concessionary petrodollars and deferred oil payment facility from the kingdom after the PTI’s ascent to power in 2018 had gone a long way in assisting the new government avert a balance-of-payments crisis, just as a similar gesture helped the PML-N build up its foreign exchange reserves in 2014. The sum of $4.2bn ($3bn in safe deposits with the State Bank and $1.2bn in oil supplies on deferred payments for a year) lent by Riyadh during the prime minister’s recent visit to Saudi Arabia will also provide some respite to the government even as it loses its grip on the external sector. The Saudi announcement has somewhat eased pressure on the rupee which strengthened by 1.7pc against the dollar in the interbank market. It has also bought Islamabad some time in case talks with the IMF for the resumption of the suspended $6bn loan go on longer than anticipated. This much was evident from Shaukat Tarin’s relaxed tone at his Wednesday presser. Only recently, the finance adviser had been shuttling between Washington and New York to salvage the IMF deal.

Mr Tarin, who claimed that Pakistan had nearly reached a deal with the IMF and that there were just a couple of matters that remained outstanding and were under discussion, did not give out details of the talks with the Fund. Yet he indicated the ‘rationalisation’ of taxes to cover the revenue gap of Rs450bn the government has foregone to keep down domestic petroleum prices. Mr Tarin also blamed the harsh IMF conditions his predecessor had accepted to secure the last tranche of $500m from the Fund in March for his troubles with the lender. However, a cursory reading of IMF officials’ statements over the last few months shows that the lender is sceptical of Pakistan’s growth policies and does not approve of its fiscal spending plans and structural reforms — particularly in the energy and tax sectors — agreed in the original agreement. Another important condition relates to a significant reduction in imports to below FY19 levels to keep the current account deficit manageable. The problem is that none of this suits the government’s pre-election growth strategy. Essentially, the current impasse with the IMF amounts to differences over the government’s expansive fiscal policies. Revival of the deal appears uncertain unless these policies are reversed.

Published in Dawn, October 29th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...
Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...