Dialogue, at last

Published September 23, 2021

SANITY appears to have at last prevailed in the matter of electoral reforms. On Tuesday, at a meeting of National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser with parliamentarians from the treasury and opposition benches, both sides agreed on the formation of a parliamentary panel to work on the issue. The welcome development has not come a moment too soon.

For the past few months, the ugly war of words between the government and the opposition, particularly regarding the proposed use of electronic voting machines and the enfranchisement of overseas Pakistanis through i-voting in the next elections had reached fever pitch. It was difficult to see where the confrontation would lead especially if the government opted to bulldoze the two contentious election-related bills through a joint sitting of parliament as was being speculated. What is beyond doubt, however, is that extreme polarisation over such an important issue as electoral reforms weakens the already not very robust foundations of democracy in the country.

Read: Only those benefitting from corrupt system are opposing EVMs: PM Imran

Most unfortunately, the government has attempted to make the Election Commission of Pakistan controversial at a time when its input is critical for the poll reforms under consideration. Sitting ministers launched blistering attacks on it in the wake of the ECP listing 37 objections to the use of EVMs in the next election. Railways Minister Azam Swati accused its members of taking bribes to rig polls while Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry alleged that the chief election commissioner — whose name was among the government’s suggested nominees to the post — was “a mouthpiece for the opposition”. The ECP rejected the allegations as baseless and issued notices to the ministers to produce evidence to back their claims.

Now that both sides have opted to take a more considered course of action, they must avoid name-calling and questioning each other’s motives. That would only vitiate the atmosphere and intensify the trust deficit between them. The ECP’s feedback would be integral to the discussion; it must have confidence it can conduct free and fair polls under the amendments proposed to the election law. It is not yet known whether the parliamentary panel will take up only the amendments dealing with EVMs and i-voting for overseas Pakistanis or examine all the proposed electoral reforms. In any event, decisions must be taken with consensus.

The objective must be to arrive at comprehensive and far-reaching reform; past reports of foreign election observers could also be consulted to this end. All the political parties in an election must have trust in the process under which it is being held. Otherwise, we will simply have more elections that are contested, with the fallout poisoning the political arena. A working relationship between the government and opposition is essential to legislative work and governance, both of which are adversely affected due to the ensuing rancour — as we have seen most recently after the 2018 election.

Published in Dawn, September 23rd, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.