Private firm allowed to sell Covid vaccine temporarily

Published April 2, 2021
The bench ruled that it would decide the question whether the exemption granted for Covid-19 vaccine import could be rescinded or not on April 12. — Wikimedia Commons/File
The bench ruled that it would decide the question whether the exemption granted for Covid-19 vaccine import could be rescinded or not on April 12. — Wikimedia Commons/File

KARACHI: While temporarily allowing a private firm to sell Covid-19 vaccine, the Sindh High Court on Thursday observed that any restriction on the sale of Covid-19 vaccine at this stage would be against public interest since it was an urgent need due to the crisis being currently faced by the country.

The single-judge bench headed by Justice Nadeem Akhtar also extended its earlier interim stay order against withdrawal of exemption notification issued by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (Drap) about Covid-19 vaccines’ import by a private firm till April 12.

The bench ruled that it would decide the question whether the exemption granted for Covid-19 vaccine import could be rescinded or not on April 12.

A pharmaceutical company filed a suit before the SHC and contended that the Drap had withdrawn its earlier notification issued on Feb 2, under which it exempted the import of Covid-19 vaccine for sale for a period of six months or till the market prices of those vaccines become available.

It was further argued that therefore the firm entered into a vaccine supply agreement with a foreign seller/exporter for the import of one million doses of Covid-19 vaccine (Sputnik-V) and the consignment had already arrived at Karachi Port, but the impugned notification was withdrawn by Drap.

SHC rules ban on sale of vaccine against public interest

When the bench took up an application of the firm seeking contempt proceedings against the authorities concerned for not releasing the vaccine from the port on Thursday, the alleged contemnor, a federal drug inspector Sindh, turned up and filed an explanation.

He contended that he was not the competent authority to release the consignment in question and thus such delay, if any, cannot be attributed to him.

However, the bench dismissed the contempt application after the lawyer for plaintiff firm said that the consignment had already been released and he did not want to press the application.

The counsel for the federal authorities, who were impleaded as defendants in the suit, informed the bench about the order of a two-judge bench issued on March 31 in the present matter and requested for time to place on record the price of Covid-19 vaccine to be fixed by the federal government on next hearing.

The lawyers for the federal authorities also sought a restraining order for the plaintiff firm not to sell the subject vaccine as the price had not been fixed yet.

However, the lawyer for the firm vehemently opposed it on the ground that the impugned notification of March 18 to withdraw the exemption was illegal.

The bench observed that the question whether the exemption granted to the Covid-19 vaccine could be rescinded or not will be decided when the main suit is to be taken up for hearing (on April 12).

“It may be observed that if the court comes to the conclusion that the subject vaccine ought to have been sold by the plaintiff at the price determined by the federal government, the excess amount, if any, received by the plaintiff can be recovered from the plaintiff as all the relevant details, such as, the number of ampules imported and sold by the plaintiff and price thereof can easily be sought from the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff shall voluntarily place all such information before this court”, it added.

“In view of the above, I am of the considered view that any restriction relating to the sale of the Covid-19 vaccine at this stage would be against the public interest because of its undisputed urgent need due to crisis being currently faced by the country,” the bench in its order concluded.

Published in Dawn, April 2nd, 2021

Opinion

A ventilator for democracy
Updated 15 Jun 2021

A ventilator for democracy

Chomsky has analysed Biden’s foreign policy succinctly, which is essentially not very different from Trump’s in most ways.
State of IKonomy
15 Jun 2021

State of IKonomy

PTI’s economic record is not rosy as some say it is.
Not by words alone
Updated 14 Jun 2021

Not by words alone

A policy shift must be backed by substance otherwise it is a statement of intent not a strategy.

Editorial

15 Jun 2021

Middle East’s plight

THE Middle East is geopolitically and economically perhaps the most important region of the world, home to much of...
Thoughtless eviction
Updated 15 Jun 2021

Thoughtless eviction

Promised compensation of Rs20,000 per month for two years is hardly worth the adversity evicted residents have to undergo.
15 Jun 2021

Cinema ‘industry’?

THE vast gap that often exists between the state’s intentions and its actual efficiency was evident in the third...
Power shortages
Updated 14 Jun 2021

Power shortages

It is high time that governance and structural reforms were introduced in the energy sector.
14 Jun 2021

Suicide in Thar

THARPARKAR is an appropriate case study for examining the factors that lead some people to the desperate, final act...
14 Jun 2021

Water woes

THIS past week saw a discussion on a water management system that, if properly implemented, should go some way...