IHC asks Zardari’s counsel to conclude arguments on bail plea

Published
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has asked the counsel for former president Asif Ali Zardari to conclude arguments on his plea seeking bail in a suspicious transaction with Bahria Town involving Rs8.3 billion. — AFP/File
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has asked the counsel for former president Asif Ali Zardari to conclude arguments on his plea seeking bail in a suspicious transaction with Bahria Town involving Rs8.3 billion. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has asked the counsel for former president Asif Ali Zardari to conclude arguments on his plea seeking bail in a suspicious transaction with Bahria Town involving Rs8.3 billion.

The IHC division bench comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani resumed hearing on the bail plea on Tuesday.

Javed Iqbal Wains, the petitioner’s counsel, told the court that Mr Zardari could not appear before the court due to his ailment. He also submitted a medical certificate in this regard.

He requested the court to adjourn hearing of the case till Jan 12 as senior defence counsel Farooq H. Naek was busy with cases in the Supreme Court.

Deputy prosecutor general of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Sardar Muzaffar Khan Abbasi, argued that the matter had been dragged on unnecessarily.

He said that Mr Zardari’s custody was required for interrogation in the suspicious transaction.

Zain Malik, the son-in-law of property tycoon Malik Riaz, is one of the accused along with Mr Zardari in the case. Mr Malik was, however, released after he entered a plea bargain with NAB.

The court reminded the counsel that pre-arrest interim bail granted to Mr Zardari in this case was conditional to cooperation with the investigation officer.

The bench advised the counsel to ask the former president to cooperate with the investigator and adjourned the hearing till Jan 12.

The IHC bench also adjourned hearing on a pre-arrest bail plea of Pakistan Peoples Party leader Rukhsana Bangash.

Ms Bangash is seeking bail in an ongoing inquiry into her assets.

The NAB’s deputy prosecutor general told the court that a questionnaire had been sent to Ms Bangash but she has not responded to it.

Advocate Wains, counsel for the petitioner, said that his client had raised certain questions on the questionnaire.

He told the court that since senior defence counsel Naek was busy in the apex court this matter should also be adjourned.

Published in Dawn, December 23rd, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

GB Assembly’s demand
Updated 21 Jul, 2026

GB Assembly’s demand

THE newly elected Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly last week adopted a unanimous resolution asking the centre to grant the...
Spain’s statement
21 Jul, 2026

Spain’s statement

IT was a one-sided affair for the most part. The FIFA World Cup 2026 concluded in the early hours of Monday for...
Slow death
21 Jul, 2026

Slow death

MANCHHAR Lake, which is situated at the foot of the Kirthar range, was once Pakistan’s largest freshwater body ...
Unmasking stability
Updated 20 Jul, 2026

Unmasking stability

THREE reports last Friday — a widening food trade gap, return to a current account deficit, and the government’s...
Flood data gap
20 Jul, 2026

Flood data gap

HAVING endured one of its worst floods last year — triggered by intense monsoons and compounded by sudden water...
Zero-dose alert
20 Jul, 2026

Zero-dose alert

ALTHOUGH Pakistan recently announced its first National Vaccine Policy, it will take time before the immunity gap ...