MULTAN: An official document reveals the Multan Electric and Power Company (Mepco) made an additional payment of Rs133.88 million to an industrial unit in violation of a contract signed between both parties, Dawn has learnt.

Power distributing companies offered the private sector to generate and supply electricity to distributors and in 2009, the Pakistan Electric Power Company drafted a policy framework for New-Captive Power Producers (N-CPPs) which was endorsed by the federal ministry of water and power.

M/s Roomi Fabrics Limited (RFL) sent a letter to chief operating officer of the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA) and an agreement between the Mepco and RFL was signed for the purchase of 10.5 megawatt.

According to the official document, the Power Acquisition Request (PAR) of Mepco for purchase of electricity from the RFL was submitted to National Energy and Power Regularity Authority (Nepra) and tariff in this regard was determined by Nepra on Jan 27, 2014.

It stated that as per clause (15.30) of the approved PAR, Nepra directed Mepco to adjust payments, if any, made to the RFL from the date of supply of electricity but instead of recovering Rs106 million

It stated that in Mepco, the adjustment of an amount of Rs106 million in excess due to tariff difference from tariff determined by Nepra was required to be recovered but the same was not done.

“Contrary to this, an additional payment of Rs27.88 million vide payment voucher No 106 dated Oct 11, 2017 was made to M/s Roomi Fabrics in violation of the contract clause-D of the PPA,” it stated.

The matter was taken up with the Mepco administration in May 2018 and also was reported to the ministry over which the administration informed that the payment of Rs27.88 million was made in the light of the Lahore High Court Multan Bench’s decision after getting the bang guarantee of Rs83.652 million while there was no mentioning of Rs106 million which were paid in excess due to tariff difference from the tariff determined by Nepra.

Source said Mepco authorities did not take action against the industrial unit despite it stepped back from the court’s direction to resolve the issue by arbitration in the same decision.

A spokesperson for Mepco said the payment was made on the direction of the LHC.

“I am not in a position to comment on the issue anymore as the matter is subjudice,” he added.

Published in Dawn, October 17th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

After the budget
Updated 26 Jun, 2026

After the budget

Though not a bad document per se, the budget for FY27 is a familiar one, and familiarity in our economic history is rarely cause for comfort.
Missing the mark
26 Jun, 2026

Missing the mark

PAKISTAN’S commitment to the SDGs is routinely reaffirmed, but the gap between promises and progress continues to...
Up in smoke
26 Jun, 2026

Up in smoke

PAKISTAN is watching an epidemic unfold as the menace of narcotic abuse hits every fourth household in Karachi ...
Reflection time
Updated 25 Jun, 2026

Reflection time

Israel is the biggest source of instability in the Middle East, and it is high time the US ended its blind support to Tel Aviv, if it genuinely wants peace in the region.
Raised temperatures
25 Jun, 2026

Raised temperatures

THE fraught situation in Azad Jammu and Kashmir requires immense patience and cool heads. Temperatures are raised on...
Debatable remedy
25 Jun, 2026

Debatable remedy

THE Pakistan Psychiatric Society’s challenge to the Federal Shariat Court’s ruling on attempted suicide deserves...