Yemen’s warring sides agree to swap over 1,000 prisoners

Published September 28, 2020
Glion (Switzerland): Head of the Houthi prisoner exchange committee, Abdulkader al Murtada (centre left), shakes hands with head of the Yemeni government delegation, Hadi Haig, at the end of a week-long meeting over a prisoner exchange agreement on Sunday.—AFP
Glion (Switzerland): Head of the Houthi prisoner exchange committee, Abdulkader al Murtada (centre left), shakes hands with head of the Yemeni government delegation, Hadi Haig, at the end of a week-long meeting over a prisoner exchange agreement on Sunday.—AFP

DUBAI: The warring sides in Yemen’s long conflict have agreed to exchange 1,081 prisoners, the United Nations mediator said on Sunday following talks in Switzerland.

Yemen’s government, which is supported by a Saudi-led military coalition, and Iran-backed Houthi rebels resolved to swap some 15,000 detainees as part of a peace deal brokered by the UN in Stockholm back in 2018.

The two sides have since undertaken sporadic prisoner exchanges, but the release of over 1,000 loyalists and insurgents — if it materialises — would mark the first large-scale handover since the war erupted in 2014.

“I am personally extremely pleased to be here to announce that you have reached a very important milestone,” UN envoy Martin Griffiths said at the end of the talks at the Swiss village of Glion, overlooking Lake Geneva.

Griffiths hailed the decision to release the prisoners as the largest such operation during Yemen’s conflict.

He also congratulated the government and the Houthis for renewing their “commitment to the full implementation of the Stockholm agreement”.

The Houthi-run Al-Masirah TV channel quoted a rebel source as confirming a deal had been reached and that both parties “express their commitment to implement the agreement”.

“What matters to us is implementing the deal, not only signing it,” senior rebel commander Mohamed Ali Al-Houthi had tweeted on Saturday.

Yemen’s Foreign Minister Mohammad al-Hadhrami welcomed the deal as a “humanitarian” breakthrough, but also said in a tweet that “the government demands the agreement is implemented without stalling”.

Dr Elisabeth Kendall, a researcher at the University of Oxford’s Pembroke College, said the deal was an “important trust-building measure” amid efforts to end the Yemen conflict, but one that would create more animosity if it faltered.

“This step has to be viewed positively, given how polarised the warring sides now are and how intractable the conflict has become,” she said.

“But there are several reasons to be wary... We have been here several times before. Prisoner swaps are agreed, then they come to nothing and those impacted end up even more frustrated and angry.” Sources on both sides had said that a deal had been reached for the prisoner exchange, indicating it was to be implemented within two weeks.

The agreement includes the release of “681 rebels and 400 government forces (and allies), among them 15 Saudis and four Sudanese”, a member of the government delegation said.

The talks began on September 18, and had been aimed at securing the release of 1,420 prisoners, including the brother of Yemeni President Mansour Hadi.

Griffiths did not provide details on which prisoners would be exchanged under the agreement reached in Glion.

But the government official said that the release of General Nasser Mansour Hadi from the hands of the rebels “has been postponed”.

The International Committee of the Red Cross is to oversee the return of detainees to their families.

Fabrizio Carboni, head of the ICRC’s Middle East and Near East operations, described the agreement as “a very positive step”.

“This release will alleviate the suffering of many detainees and many families who have been waiting for so long to be reunited,” he said at the Glion ceremony.

“We are convinced that this release... will contribute to renew solid, valid peace talks.” Tens of thousands of people, mostly civilians, have died in the Yemen conflict, which has sparked what the United Nations calls the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.

Published in Dawn, September 28th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...