Opposition again helps govt pass FATF-related laws

Published August 13, 2020
The minister angered the opposition by alleging that it had initially linked the passage of the legislations of national importance to changes in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Ordinance. — DawnNewsTV/File
The minister angered the opposition by alleging that it had initially linked the passage of the legislations of national importance to changes in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Ordinance. — DawnNewsTV/File

ISLAMABAD: A day after the government reached an understanding with the opposition, five more FATF-related laws sailed through the National Assembly on Wednesday.

The house, however, witnessed a brief uproar when the opposition members objected to a part of Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s speech.

They held a noisy protest when Mr Qureshi took the floor soon after conciliatory speeches by Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) Syed Naveed Qamar and Khawaja Asif of the Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N), and angered the opposition by alleging that it had initially linked the passage of the legislations of national importance to changes in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Ordinance.

The situation turned ugly when the minister called PPP MNA from Karachi Agha Rafiullah an “immature” parliamentarian.

However, realising that his speech could spoil the otherwise conducive environment in the house and create problems for the government in getting the key legislations approved, the minister immediately took his seat as soon as the opposition members stood up and started raising slogans, calling him “a liar”.

Foreign minister’s speech stirs brief commotion in NA

He later withdrew his words which he said about the opposition lawmaker.

Syed Naveed Qamar termed the minister’s remarks “totally unfair” and uncalled-for at a time when the opposition was cooperating with the government to ensure the smooth passage of bills to meet the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) conditions.

He clarified that the opposition had never linked the NAB issue with FATF laws, saying the minister had made a wrong statement.

Another PPP leader, Raja Pervez Ashraf, also protested over Mr Qureshi’s remarks, alleging that it seemed the minister had intentionally tried to spoil the environment of the house.

Earlier, the government and the opposition succeeded in reaching a consensus on six of the eight FATF-related laws on Tuesday.

But, the government, at the last minute, agreed to hold back the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) Waqf Properties Bill after the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA) members objected to some of its clauses.

The government had previously agreed to defer the controversial Anti-Money Laundering and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) bills to hold further discussions with the opposition on them.

The breakthrough was achieved during a meeting between the government and opposition representatives at the residence of National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser on Tuesday — a day after the government delayed presentation of five FATF-related bills.

The government decided to engage the opposition parties through the speaker with whose efforts three other bills were approved by the parliament. It had decided to take the opposition on board on the legislations that had already been passed by the assembly’s standing committees amid protest by the opposition parties which announced that they would block the bills in parliament.

The government had successfully managed to get two FATF-related bills — the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill and the United Nations (Security Council) (Amendment) Bill — passed from both houses with the support of two main opposition parties.

However, the smaller parties, including Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), Jamaat-i-Islami and nationalist parties from Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, had protested their non-inclusion in the consultation process.

The JUI-F, however, supported the bills on Wednesday after its member, Shahida Akhtar Ali, was formally invited to the talks following the party’s strong protest in the National Assembly on Monday.

Chief of his own faction of Balochistan National Party (BNP) Sardar Akhtar Mengal, however, announced that his party would abstain from voting on the bills.

The bills that were passed on Wednesday were the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, the Limited Liability Partnership (Amendment) Bill, the Companies (Amendment) Bill, the Control of Narcotic Substances (Amendment) Bill and the ICT Trust Bill.

The MMA members, however, opposed the ICT Trust Bill which enabled the intelligence agencies to carry out verifications at the time of registration of trusts and tasking them to monitor their activities.

Speaking against the bill, Maulana Abdul Akbar Chitrali said after passage of the bill, philanthropists would be hesitant to donate to mosques, seminaries and other charitable organisations as no one would want to be followed by agency people.

Hours after the passage of the bills from the lower house, the government convened a session of the Senate on Thursday evening to get the laws approved so that they could become acts of parliament. Sources, however, said the opposition would try to prevent the government from getting the legislations passed from the Senate on the same day.

There are indications that the opposition would press the government to send the bills to the Senate committees as per legislative process.

At the outset, PPP’s Syed Naveed Qamar gave an explanation for the opposition’s support to the bills, saying that they were doing so as the government had incorporated most of their amendments to the proposed legislations.

He said they wanted to see Pakistan come out of the grey list after fulfilling the FATF conditions, but at the same time, they wanted the fundamental rights of the citizens protected.

He said they did not want laws to be misused like in the past when politicians were targeted through the ATC Act and NAB laws.

Mr Qamar said they also sought an end to terror financing, but at the same time they needed to ensure that genuine businessmen and investors were not affected by these laws to prevent the capital flight from the country.

Mohsin Shahnawaz Ranjha of the PML-N said it was their responsibility to ensure fundamental rights of citizens were not encroached upon while fulfilling the FATF conditions.

Earlier, PML-N’s Khawaja Asif drew the attention of the house towards an FIR registered against party workers in Lahore on Tuesday for allegedly attacking NAB office and policemen and which included the name of Public Accounts Committee Chairman Rana Tanveer Hussain.

He alleged that this was carried out at the behest of the Punjab government despite the fact that he was present in the assembly, and was in a meeting with the speaker in Islamabad.

Asad Qaiser directed Khawaja Asif to move a privilege motion and he would take action against those responsible.

Details of bills

Under the ATC law, banks and financial institutions have been barred from providing loan facility, financial support or credit cards to proscribed persons.

It further says that “a person commits an offence if he knowingly or willfully pays for or provides money or other property or facilitate in any manner the travel of a person anywhere for the purpose of perpetrating, participating in, assisting or preparing for a terrorist act or for the purpose of providing or receiving training for terrorist related activities.”

The Limited Liability Partnership (Amendment) Bill suggests various amendments to Limited Liability Partnership Act 2017 to ensure compliance with the recommendations on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism issued by the FATF.

The Companies (Amendment) Bill is aimed at removing deficiencies, including lack of explicit prohibition on issuance of bearer shares or bearer share warrants, lack of obligations for companies to hold beneficial ownership in formation etc.

The Control of Narcotics Substances (Amendment) Bill is aimed at removing a minor deficiency in Section 12 of CNS Act 1997 and restricts the acts of concealment or disguise by making false declaration.

Published in Dawn, August 13th, 2020

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

THE Iran-Israel shadow war has very much come out into the open. Tel Aviv had been targeting Tehran’s assets for...
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...