SC upholds LHC’s order in Model Town case

Published February 14, 2020
SC had taken up an appeal of the Punjab government, PAT's Jawad Hamid. — Online/File
SC had taken up an appeal of the Punjab government, PAT's Jawad Hamid. — Online/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Lahore High Court’s March 2019 order of suspending the Punjab government’s Joint Investigation Team (JIT) to hold a fresh probe into the 2014 Lahore Model Town incident.

But a three-judge Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed, also expected that the high court which was seized with the matter will decide the case within three months in view of the urgency of the matter.

The Supreme Court, had taken up an appeal of the Punjab government as well as of Jawad Hamid , a private complainant of Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT), against the March 2019 order of the high court which with a majority decision of two to one had suspended the new JIT formed by the Punjab government.

On June 17, 2014, 10 supporters of the PAT, including some women, lost their lives and several others were injured during a clash between police and supporters and workers of the Minhaj-ul-Quran, an NGO, to remove pickets erected outside the residence of Dr Tahirul Qadri in Model Town, Lahore.

Earlier, the Punjab government had constituted the fresh JIT for the third time when a five-judge Supreme Court on Dec 5, 2018, disposed of a petition seeking re-probe of the Model Town incident after the then advocate general of Punjab Ahmed Awais assured the court that the provincial government had decided to constitute the JIT in terms of Section 19 of the Anti Terrorism Act (ATA).

Then the Supreme Court, headed by then Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, had taken up a petition moved by Bisma Amjad, the daughter of one of the slain persons, Tanzeela.

On Thursday when the case was taken up by the Supreme Court, Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan recalled the Dec 5 order and highlighted that all parties in the matter were before the court when the order had been passed.

Justice Ahsan also questioned how the high court could subvert the Supreme Court’s order which was issued by a five-judge bench after hearing all sides and emphasised upon the need of recalling the high court order.

But Justice Sajjad Ali Shah wondered that when a private complaint had already been pending before the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC), then how the case initiated by the provincial government could proceed.

Advocates Azam Nazeer Tarar and Ashtar Ausaf, who were representing Khurram Rafiq and Rizwan Qadir Hashmi, the two accused police officers, recalled an earlier seven-judge Supreme Court judgement in which it was held that JIT investigation could not be carried on when the matter was already pending before a trial court.

Advocate Ali Zafar, representing Jawad Hamid, argued in the court that the Supreme Court should direct the high court to decide the matter within two weeks, but JIT should continue its investigations at the same time adding that blocking the JIT investigations amounted to mala fide.

Published in Dawn, February 14th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Immunity gap
Updated 26 Apr, 2026

Immunity gap

Pakistan’s Big Catch-Up campaign showed progress but also exposed the scale of gaps in routine immunisation.
Danger on repeat
26 Apr, 2026

Danger on repeat

DISASTERS have typically been framed as acts of nature. Of late, they look increasingly like tests of preparedness...
Loose lips
26 Apr, 2026

Loose lips

PAKISTANIS have by now gained something of an international reputation for their gallows humour, but it seems that...
Lebanon truce
Updated 25 Apr, 2026

Lebanon truce

THE fact that the truce between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for three weeks should be welcomed. But there...
Terrorism again
25 Apr, 2026

Terrorism again

THE elimination of 22 terrorists in an intelligence-based operation in Khyber highlights both the scale and ...
Taxing technology
25 Apr, 2026

Taxing technology

THE recent decision by the FBR’s Directorate General of Customs Valuation to increase the ‘assessed value’ of...