GST payment

Published December 15, 2019

I HAVE observed that several restaurants in Lahore, particularly those located in DHA and Gulberg, charge a 16 per cent general sales tax (GST) in their invoices, which actually were fictitious and not generated through restaurant invoice monitoring service (RIMS) installed by Punjab Revenue Authority (PRA) at their premises.

These restaurants want to generate such invoices offline through a separate printer and thus pocket the sales tax. I have shared a few such invoices with the PRA during the recent months.

May I therefore suggest that the PRA may devise a system similar to the verification of CNIC whereby a customer could just check the veracity of the GST paid invoice by sending number of the relevant invoice by SMS to a designated number which confirms the invoice to be linked with RIMS or otherwise.

I am sure the PRA could substantially increase its sales tax collection through this system-driven control.

Basharat Malik
Lahore

Published in Dawn, December 15th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...