Amending NAB law

Published November 4, 2019

THE government has promulgated an ordinance through which it has amended the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 so that any person arrested for an offence involving an amount above Rs50m shall be entitled to ‘C’ class or equivalent in prison. This selective amendment in the NAB law, while many controversial elements remain in place, has rightfully elicited concerns that the government is only interested in amendments that affect its political opponents. This is unfortunate because the NAB law in its present shape is a holdover from the Musharraf years and its genesis is rooted in that regime’s intent to persecute and punish politicians on the other side of the divide. Framed with such a purpose in mind, the ordinance was packed with sweeping powers that often bypassed the established due process of law within the ambit of the courts. It is a telling failure of political will and vision that successive governments have refused to amend the law in order to bring it closer to a shape befitting a constitutional democracy.

This failure has come at a cost. Untethered from the constraints of the judiciary and unaccountable in any real sense to any other institution in the dispensation of its brand of accountability, NAB is today riding roughshod over politicians, bureaucrats and people from many other walks of life. The law in its present form allows NAB discretion that automatically translates into selectivity in the application of these powers. For instance, draconian provisions such as the denial of bail during the investigation stage have led to the arrest of prominent politicians without formal charges being framed against them. Indeed, it is not surprising that opposition leaders are facing the brunt of this accountability while various people associated with the ruling alliance facing similar accusations enjoy the fruits of unfettered freedom. It is clear then, that while it may be convenient to blame the decision-makers at NAB for the reckless use of their powers, the real fault lies with the law itself. Legal experts say the ordinance must be overhauled so it can be cleansed of those powers that go against legal checks and balances. Again as an example, the ordinance allows NAB to charge people on “misuse of authority” whereas this is a vague charge that can be applied to any decision taken in the running of state affairs. The hounding and arrests of many bureaucrats on such charges leading to near-paralysis in decision-making is a case in point. Selectively amending the NAB Ordinance is plain wrong.

Published in Dawn, November 4th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.