LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday extended the pre-arrest bail of the Leader of Opposition in Punjab Assembly, Hamza Shahbaz, till April 25 in three inquiries by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), including in Ramzan Sugar Mills, Punjab Saaf Pani Company and assets beyond means.

Police took strict security measures on the high court premises before appearance of Mr Hamza as no one was allowed to attend the proceedings except the lawyers engaged in the case from both sides --- the NAB and the petitioner.

The police personnel also denied access to the media as majority of the reporters failed to enter the courtroom despite their names being mentioned in a list provided to the police by public relations department of the high court.

PML-N leaders and workers were also kept away from the block where a two-judge bench sat to hear the bail petitions.

During the hearing, a NAB additional prosecutor told the bench that Mr Hamza appeared before an investigation team of the bureau the other day but he failed to answer the interrogators’ queries. He said Hamza took a plea that he would respond to the queries in the court.

Hamza’s counsel complained that the copies of a questionnaire and the case record provided by the NAB were either incomplete or unreadable. He sought time to respond to the bureau’s queries.

The bench comprising Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan and Justice Mirza Viqas Rauf adjourned the hearing, extending the interim pre-arrest bail of Mr Hamza till April 25.

The bench also issued notice to the NAB on another petition of Mr Hamza seeking contempt proceedings against the officials of the anti-graft watchdog for conducting raids at his residence in violation of a court order.

The opposition leader contended that the court in an order disposed of his previous bail petition with a direction to the NAB to communicate to Mr Hamza if it found any ground for his arrest so that he could have sufficient time of at least ten days for approaching the court of competent jurisdiction.

However, he said the NAB issued arrest warrants and raided his house twice in sheer violation of the court’s order. Therefore, he asked the court to initiate contempt proceedings against the officials involved in conducting raids at his residence.

Published in Dawn, April 18th, 2019

Opinion

Police & prosecution
16 Jan 2021

Police & prosecution

Yasin Malik’s case is a revealing example of Modi’s political vendetta.
Changes in privacy policy
16 Jan 2021

Changes in privacy policy

It is indeed a blunder by WhatsApp to move towards a model that is less private than before.
A national dialogue?
15 Jan 2021

A national dialogue?

Fundamental reforms are needed to change the ‘system of spoils’, not save it.

Editorial

16 Jan 2021

Gas liberalisation

AFTER drawing much criticism from both consumers and the opposition over its mismanagement of the energy sector that...
16 Jan 2021

Osama Satti inquiry

THE findings of the judicial inquiry into the Jan 2 killing of 21-year-old Osama Satti in Islamabad merely confirms...
Updated 16 Jan 2021

British MP on IHK

DESPITE sustained efforts by New Delhi’s rulers to remove India-held Kashmir from the global discourse, people of...
Updated 15 Jan 2021

Trump’s impeachment

The impeachment move may well remain symbolic in nature; even then, the symbolism itself is a potent one.
15 Jan 2021

Economic growth

MOODY’S Investors Service expects Pakistan’s economy to grow by a modest 1.5pc in FY2021, much higher than the...
15 Jan 2021

Madressah students

GETTING students of madressahs involved in politics is a bad idea, primarily because seminarians should be...