Hurriyat uproar

Published
47

In the volatile world of Pakistan-India relations, often seemingly harmless incidents can be blown out of proportion, leaving any chances of dialogue and forward movement towards peace looking increasingly distant. And as it has been witnessed in the recent past, more often than not the right-wing BJP-led government in Delhi has torpedoed chances of peace with Pakistan thanks to its unreasonable attitude and rigidity.

On Thursday, it emerged that a phone call between Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and All Parties Hurriyat Conference leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq had been taken as an affront by India. Pakistan’s high commissioner in Delhi was summoned by the Indian government and told that the phone call amounted to “interference in [India’s] internal affairs”.

Pakistan, in response, called up India’s high commissioner to receive a protest over the reaction to the phone call.

It is difficult to understand how Delhi considers the conversation between Mr Qureshi and the Mirwaiz as an “attempt to undermine India’s unity”. Moreover, the Indian foreign secretary’s language, alleging that this country “abets ... individuals associated with terrorism” is highly unacceptable and contrary to the facts, as the Mirwaiz is a moderate Kashmiri leader spearheading a peaceful political movement for the region’s rights, and those involved in the armed struggle are indigenous fighters.

Unfortunately, there seems to be a negative pattern the Hindu nationalist BJP government is following. Previously, too, India has raised a hue and cry over meetings between Pakistani diplomats and Kashmiri leaders, going as far as to cancel scheduled bilateral talks, even though Pakistan’s moral and political support for India-occupied Kashmir is unambiguous, and the issue is an internationally acknowledged dispute.

India under Mr Modi has made it clear that peace with Pakistan is not part of its priorities; meetings of Saarc have been scuttled due to Indian intransigence, while the bilateral talks process is in deep freeze. And while there seemed to be some potential in Pakistan’s offer to open the Kartarpur corridor, India’s politicisation of the issue is dampening hopes of a breakthrough.

Considering the BJP’s roots in the fanatical RSS — which has no love lost for Pakistan or Muslims — it is understandable that Mr Modi and his party would find excuses to avoid talking to Pakistan. And with national elections only a couple of months away, the BJP will not want to be seen as going ‘soft’ on Pakistan in order to please the saffron brigade and scoop up more votes.

However, this narrow, communal approach will do little to further peace in South Asia. Whatever issues Delhi has must be communicated to Pakistan through diplomatic channels, and only through sustained bilateral dialogue can mistrust give way to a constructive relationship.

It is hoped that after the Indian elections, whichever party takes power in Delhi will take a progressive approach towards Pakistan and restart the dialogue process in earnest so that peace can be achieved in this region.

Published in Dawn, February 2nd, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Makkah agreement
Updated 09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
Conflicting priorities
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
FIFA controversy
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...
Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.