Generation Wealth takes a deep look at the shallowness of greed

Published July 27, 2018
Photographs from Lauren Greenfield’s book Fast Forward appear throughout her new documentary Generation Wealth. The subject of this 1993 photo, a teenager at Beverly Hills High School identified only as Mijanou, also appears in the film, reflecting on how her life, at 42, has changed.
Photographs from Lauren Greenfield’s book Fast Forward appear throughout her new documentary Generation Wealth. The subject of this 1993 photo, a teenager at Beverly Hills High School identified only as Mijanou, also appears in the film, reflecting on how her life, at 42, has changed.

PHOTOGRAPHER and film-maker Lauren Greenfield has made a career out of documenting the culture of conspicuous consumption and the commodification of all things — including the human body. In her 2006 feature documentary debut, Thin, about women with eating disorders, and the 2012 The Queen of Versailles, about a wealthy couple’s attempt to build a house in Florida modeled after the French royal palace, Greenfield has turned her camera on an America obsessed with the superficial.

It’s an obsession that has fascinated her for 25 years, ever since Greenfield found the first expression of her artistic voice in photographs of teenagers in Los Angeles, a project that would go on to become the acclaimed and disturbing 1997 book Fast Forward: Growing Up in the Shadow of Hollywood.

Greenfield’s latest documentary, Generation Wealth, is both a continuation of that obsession and a reflection upon it. In a sense, the film is a kind of double portrait, one in which the Los Angeles-bred artist and armchair anthropologist sees herself reflected in the mirror of her work, along with her self-regarding subjects. Of the world of privilege and perverse values that she has come to examine so closely — in books, exhibitions and films that dissect unfettered capitalism and the craving for more — she describes herself as both “critic and participant”.

What’s missing, however, from this self-examination is perspective.

Although Generation Wealth features Greenfield’s first-person narration, as well as interviews with her psychologist mother, Patricia Marks Greenfield, and home-movie-style footage of Greenfield with her sons and husband, the insights into Greenfield’s own psyche feel more scant and superficial than those she gleans from others. Meaty interviews with journalist Chris Hedges, for instance, lend the film needed context and a sense of intellectual detachment.

In one segment, Hedges opines that modern society’s lack of upward mobility — its class inelasticity — has made the outward appearance of wealth matter disproportionately more than ever. We desire $700 shoes, gilded bling and other trappings of the “haves”, because we want to disguise the fact that we are the have-nots.

Needless to say, Donald Trump appears in the film, if only in passing, about a half-hour in, when the businessman turned president’s role as an avatar of the American Dream — a self-made mogul, or so he would have us believe — is held up as an explanation of his political ascendancy. We voted for him, in other words, because we want to be him, or at least to believe the version of him we saw on The Apprentice. (Generation Wealth is distributed by Amazon Studios. Amazon chief executive Jeffrey Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

Interviews with the subjects, now 40-ish, of Fast Forward, paired with shots from the book of their former, less introspective adolescent selves, also add useful substance and poignant wisdom. Florian Homm, the wealthy German former hedge fund manager who went on the lam in 2007 after being charged with investment fraud by the US government, appears in interviews too. Homm comes across as unchastened, but at least more cautious about the empty promises of the prosperity gospel. “If you think that money will buy you anything and everything,” he says, “you’ve never, ever had money.”

Greenfield, for the most part, wisely leaves the preaching to others. If Generation Wealth has a message that empty acquisitiveness is bad, it delivers it, like the rest of her work, by showing, not telling.

—By arrangement with The Washington Post

Published in Dawn, July 27th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...