Modi's party pulls out of governing alliance in Indian Kashmir

Published June 19, 2018
PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti, centre, surrounded by members of her former cabinet addresses the media after resigning as the chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir after BJP pulled out of the coalition. — AP
PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti, centre, surrounded by members of her former cabinet addresses the media after resigning as the chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir after BJP pulled out of the coalition. — AP

India's ruling party withdrew on Tuesday from an alliance government in the India-held Kashmir region in what analysts described as an attempt to appear tough on militancy before a general election.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) said it was pulling out of the governing coalition in Jammu and Kashmir state because of worsening “terrorism and violence”.

The Hindu nationalist party had ruled in the restive state since March 2015 when it struck an unlikely alliance with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), a local political outfit which has advocated more autonomy for Kashmir.

“It has become untenable for the BJP to continue in the alliance government in Jammu and Kashmir,” senior BJP leader Ram Madhav told reporters in New Delhi, referring to India's only Muslim-majority state.

“Today there is an increase in terrorism and violence, radicalisation is spreading fast.”

Madhav said the state government had failed to curb radicalisation or guarantee civilian rights in the volatile territory disputed with Pakistan.

The state's chief minister Mehbooba Mufti, who hails from the PDP, tendered her resignation after the alliance lost the majority to rule.

The state's governor, a figurehead who is appointed by New Delhi, will rule Jammu and Kashmir until fresh elections are held or a new coalition is cobbled together.

The move was seen as the BJP walking back its involvement in the troubled state, which has been racked by conflict for decades but which has witnessed an upsurge of violence under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

This decision allows the BJP to act tough on Kashmir before a general election next year in which Modi will seek a second term in office, analysts said.

“What it [BJP] will do between now and elections is increase its political rhetoric against the separatists in Kashmir,” said Manoj Joshi from the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation.

“It will be political rhetoric of how the BJP will save the situation in the Kashmir region of the state,” he told AFP.

The decision means Modi's BJP controls one less state. But it will still govern 18 of India's 29 states outright or in coalitions.

The PDP, which draws its support from the mainly Muslim north of the state, has long demanded the removal of a draconian law that gives Indian forces sweeping powers to search, enter property and shoot on sight.

The BJP, whose base lies in the Hindu-dominated south, said the law was needed to curb separatists fighting for Kashmir's independence or for its merger with Pakistan.

The fighting has left tens of thousands of people, mostly civilians, dead.

Opinion

Editorial

Reforming militants
24 Jul, 2024

Reforming militants

Such initiatives have been tried before, in Swat for instance, at centres run by the military as well as NGOs.
IPP debate
24 Jul, 2024

IPP debate

A FIERCE debate blaming the exorbitant electricity prices on expensive power purchase agreements with IPPs has been...
Political vendettas
24 Jul, 2024

Political vendettas

IT seems that the PML-N and PPP need to be reminded again that they are doing themselves a considerable disservice ...
Security concerns
23 Jul, 2024

Security concerns

All stakeholders want what is best for the country and its people; their differing approaches shouldn’t be viewed with such suspicion all the time.
Frankfurt vandalism
23 Jul, 2024

Frankfurt vandalism

THE state needs to seek serious answers from the German authorities regarding the July 20 mob attack targeting...
Stressed cotton economy
23 Jul, 2024

Stressed cotton economy

DECREASING cotton production should be a worry for the government because of its socioeconomic implications. Early...