Provincial budgets

Published
2

THE provincial governments, it would seem, have largely given up their responsibilities as the end of their terms approaches.

The latest example of this comes from the government of Punjab, which has shied away from announcing a budget at all, giving as their justification “the limit of our mandate” and the need to avoid “passing the burden of our development works on to the next government”.

For its part, Balochistan has presented a full-year budget, but with a massive deficit that is 70pc of its development expenditures.

Clearly, very little thought has gone into formulating this budget and finding ways to balance out its priorities and obligations.

Both governments perhaps stand on opposite ends of the spectrum: Balochistan is not worried about leaving an uncontrollable fiscal situation to its successor, while Punjab would have us believe that it is so concerned about the sensitivities of the next government that it will not even announce a budget or authorise expenditures beyond the end of the provincial government’s term.

Both stances are disingenuous.

The authorities in Lahore cannot be so concerned about the end of their mandate that they would practically halt disbursements to ongoing schemes once their term ends.

Halting work on development projects under implementation does nobody a service, not even the incoming government.

If the authorities in Lahore were actually worried about the prerogatives of the next setup, there were better ways of addressing the issue instead of shying away from announcing a budget.

Doing so smacks of disingenuousness.

They could have, for instance, issued an authorisation for the interim rulers to continue with the expenditures, while approving funds for those projects that are already under way, and leaving behind an unallocated portion in the development budget for the next government to use as per its wishes.

Likewise for Balochistan, hiking development spending by 25pc while programming lower revenue growth shows that the province is more interested in spending rather than worrying about where the funds to pay for all the projects will come from.

What Punjab and Balochistan have done is to simply signal that they have lost all interest in what happens once they are no longer in office.

That is not respecting the mandate of the incoming government.

In fact, it is a dereliction of duty to not prepare for a handover of power while ensuring that the process remains smooth and orderly.

Published in Dawn, May 16th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...