Nisrat Azad is the head of a family who owns a parcel of land in Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and he is full of grief and anger. The chestnut and fruit trees on his land have been cut down to make space for a transmission line of running from the Golan Gol Hydropower Project, Chitral (GGHPC).
“There was a time when I and my family felt like proud owners chestnut trees, but now we have nothing to left to be proud of,” Azad said.
In the land jointly owned by his family their forefathers had planted the trees, which took more than a century to grow but, he said, the Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) contractors, cut them down ruthlessly despite petitions in court against the process.
He said 1,300 trees had been chopped down, including 253 chestnut trees, and the family was still waiting for compensation.

Pakistan, struggling with power shortage problems, expects the plant to add 108 MW of electricity supply on its completion. But the project has already been the subject of delays and controversy. In October 2016, a senior German consultant had resigned, allegedly over the ignoring of his advice on how transmission lines were being routed by contractors.
Wapda sources said the transmission line from GGHPC to Chakdara grade station is 206 kilometres long, along which 813 towers constructed. Wapda officials did not share data on the cutting of trees on private lands, saying that the Chitral forest and agriculture department would do an estimate and compensate the people.
The Chitral forest and agriculture department confirmed that walnut trees are protected and a No Objection Certificate (NOC) must be obtained from the department before any could be cut.
According to the department neither Wapda nor its contractors had obtained an NOC. The department has no data regarding the cutting of the trees. On contacting the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, they also said they were unaware of the development.
The EPA Khyber Pakhtunkhwa said Wapda had not submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report and could not obtain an NOC for the transmission line of the GGHPC. They did clarify that an NOC was obtained for the GGHPC but not for the transmission line.
Wapda officials claimed they did obtain an NOC for both the GGHPC and the transmission line project from EPA KP, but despite requests, they did not share the EIA report or any other data.


Alam said, “There was enough barren land and space along the bank of the river to pass the transmission line, but Wapda ignored our appeals.”
“I also provided the alternative map for the transmission line to the Wapda but in order to benefit the contractor they chose private land to for the transmission line”, he claimed.
Muhammad Shaukat, a forest officer from Chitral, said that the chestnut trees which were chopped down were very old. A chestnut grows two to six inches in a year and it takes many decades for a tree to mature.
To add insult to injury, 15,000 people in Chitral are also not being provided power from the power plant.
— This article was originally published on The Third Pole and has been reproduced with permission.





























