Internet censorship

Published December 25, 2017

FOR most democracies, the benefits and challenges of social media are increasingly apparent. However, when governments arbitrarily clamp down on internet freedoms, not only is that blatant censorship it is also an infringement of fundamental liberties. In its new report Internet Landscape of Pakistan 2017, Bytes for All Pakistan notes that the real risk to freedom of expression for online activists and journalists, especially those with outspoken, secular and anti-establishment views, emanates from the repressive mindset of the state and non-state actors. Allegedly both groups threaten online users with real-life repercussions, including abductions, enforced disappearances, and blasphemy charges. Monitoring the state of freedom of expression and the restrictions posed by legislative and executive measures in online and offline spaces, the report found an uptick in threats, including rising cybercrimes, increased use of cyber armies (by rival political parties and state actors), enforced disappearances and the misuse of legislation. Amending the draconian Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016, to clearly define cybercrimes is imperative given the growing incidence of arbitrary censorship and offline interrogations and harassment.

It is condemnable that the government turns to Peca to silence progressive voices citing ‘national security’ as justification. With the FIA having a new mandate to fight cybercrime, this move has endorsed online censorship with authoritarian undertones. It is because of this kind of intervention in internet policy that social media activists and journalists were summoned by the investigation agencies for their online expression this year. Safeguarding digital spaces should mean regulating and removing hate content and militant social media handles rather than silencing dissenting views using social and legal vigilantism. Our state must understand the great power of online spaces with potential to institute change of all kinds; even impact the fate of nation states. Committing to upholding free expression is a hallmark of a nation’s democratic credentials — and especially important when access to online spaces is rising to increase the velocity of political expression and activism.

Published in Dawn, December 25th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...