ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday expressed concern over the performance of the advocate general of Islamabad due to his absence in important cases.

IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui expressed his concern while hearing a case related to the registration of an FIR against the US Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) station chief in Pakistan for carrying out drone attacks in North Waziristan.

The judge noticed that Advocate General Mian Abdul Rauf was absent despite repeated directions to ensure his presence in court and said he seemed reluctant to assist the court in the implementation of the order for registering the said FIR.

“The secretary interior is directed to ensure presence of advocate general during next hearing,” Justice Siddiqui finally ordered.

“In case, he (advocate general) would fail to appear, the court would pass an ex-parte order on the basis of arguments presented by the petitioner’s counsel”, the order says.

In June 2015, IHC had directed the inspector general of police (IGP) Islamabad to submit a compliance report after registering an FIR against former CIA station chief Jonathan Banks and legal adviser John A. Rizzo.

The Secretariat police registered the FIR but transferred the case to the Fata Secretariat.

Advocate General Rauf last year appeared before the court and said that the court issued the order for the registration of an FIR despite the fact that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter.

He requested the court to grant time to enable him to assist the court on the jurisdiction.

The matter has remained pending since then as the advocate general never appeared during successive hearings of the case.

The petitioner in this case, Abdul Karim Khan, was seeking the registration of an FIR against CIA’s ex station chief and former legal advisor since he lost his brother and son in a US drone strike in North Waziristan in December 2009.

Karim Khan in his application said the drone attacks were carried out on the directions of the former CIA station chief.

The petitioner’s counsel, Barrister Mirza Shehzad Akbar, contended before the court that contempt proceedings can be initiated against the respondent police officials for defying court orders.

Published in Dawn, November 14th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...