ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday expressed concern over the performance of the advocate general of Islamabad due to his absence in important cases.

IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui expressed his concern while hearing a case related to the registration of an FIR against the US Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) station chief in Pakistan for carrying out drone attacks in North Waziristan.

The judge noticed that Advocate General Mian Abdul Rauf was absent despite repeated directions to ensure his presence in court and said he seemed reluctant to assist the court in the implementation of the order for registering the said FIR.

“The secretary interior is directed to ensure presence of advocate general during next hearing,” Justice Siddiqui finally ordered.

“In case, he (advocate general) would fail to appear, the court would pass an ex-parte order on the basis of arguments presented by the petitioner’s counsel”, the order says.

In June 2015, IHC had directed the inspector general of police (IGP) Islamabad to submit a compliance report after registering an FIR against former CIA station chief Jonathan Banks and legal adviser John A. Rizzo.

The Secretariat police registered the FIR but transferred the case to the Fata Secretariat.

Advocate General Rauf last year appeared before the court and said that the court issued the order for the registration of an FIR despite the fact that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter.

He requested the court to grant time to enable him to assist the court on the jurisdiction.

The matter has remained pending since then as the advocate general never appeared during successive hearings of the case.

The petitioner in this case, Abdul Karim Khan, was seeking the registration of an FIR against CIA’s ex station chief and former legal advisor since he lost his brother and son in a US drone strike in North Waziristan in December 2009.

Karim Khan in his application said the drone attacks were carried out on the directions of the former CIA station chief.

The petitioner’s counsel, Barrister Mirza Shehzad Akbar, contended before the court that contempt proceedings can be initiated against the respondent police officials for defying court orders.

Published in Dawn, November 14th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

March in Pindi
Updated 26 Nov, 2022

March in Pindi

WITH the chief’s appointment out of the way and the army intent on staying out of politics, the fight is now down...
Tough IMF position
26 Nov, 2022

Tough IMF position

THE IMF has made it clear that Pakistan’s “timely finalisation of the [flood] recovery plan” — the key ...
The youth vote
26 Nov, 2022

The youth vote

PAKISTAN is an overwhelmingly young nation, with about 64pc of the population under 30. Yet our political system has...
Hard reset
Updated 26 Nov, 2022

Hard reset

IT is done. What should have been a routine matter in simpler times had this year become a vortex that seemingly...
Order of precedence
25 Nov, 2022

Order of precedence

IN Pakistan as well as abroad, there are few illusions about who actually calls the shots in this country. This...
Politicised police
25 Nov, 2022

Politicised police

AN important case is being heard at the Supreme Court these days, whose outcome could have a far-reaching impact on ...