Zardari appeals verdict in Benazir murder case

Published September 19, 2017
RAWALPINDI: Pakistan Peoples Party leader Latif Khosa talks to the media after the party challenged the verdict of the Benazir Bhutto murder case in the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench on Monday.—INP
RAWALPINDI: Pakistan Peoples Party leader Latif Khosa talks to the media after the party challenged the verdict of the Benazir Bhutto murder case in the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench on Monday.—INP

ISLAMABAD: Nearly a decade after former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairperson Asif Ali Zardari finally became a party to his wife’s murder case.

The former president challenged the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) verdict of Aug 31 in the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench on Monday, seeking death penalty for retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and two senior police officers, who were sentenced to 17 years in prison in connection with Ms Bhutto’s murder.

Last month, ATC Judge Asghar Ali Khan had acquitted five alleged suspects affiliated with the banned the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), but convicted police officers Saud Aziz and Khurram Shehzad for criminal negligence.

Former president Musharraf was also declared a proclaimed offender and his moveable and immovable properties were ordered to be confiscated.

Seeks death penalty for Musharraf, police officers; challenges acquittal of TTP men

In three appeals, filed through his counsel Syed Nayyer Hussain Bokhari and Sardar Latif Khosa, Mr Zardari has challenged the acquittal of the five TTP suspects — Rafaqat Hussain, Husnain Gul, Sher Zaman, Rashid Ahmed and Aitzaz Shah.

A second appeal objects to the 17-year prison term awarded to Saud Aziz and Khurram Shehzad, while the third asks why the ATC judge separated the case of Gen Musharraf, when 68 witnesses, including US lobbyist Mark Siegel, had testified in the matter a couple of years ago.

According to the appeal, “retired General Pervez Musharraf, Saud Aziz and Khurram Shehzad cannot escape the gallows”.

It cites the testimony of Mr Siegel who said that Gen Musharraf did not want Benazir to return to the country before the 2008 general elections and had threatened her with dire consequences.

“Even Saud Aziz and Khurram Shehzad were privy to the conspiracy to eliminate Benazir Bhutto,” the appeal alleged.

The ATC judge, the appeal maintained, ignored strong evidence against the accused and wrongly gave them the benefit of doubt.

An LHC bench consisting of Justice Mohammad Tariq Abbasi and Justice Habib Amirullah will take up the appeal on Sept 21.

The same bench will also resume hearing appeals filed by Saud Aziz and Khurram Shehzad against their conviction.

Former DIG Aziz is facing charges of removing an officer deployed for the ‘box security’ of the slain leader and ordering him to reach Sadiqabad after a Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz rally came under attack near Islamabad Expressway on Dec 27, 2007.

He is also accused of not conducting a post-mortem on Ms Bhutto’s body.

Former SSP Shehzad was convicted of washing the crime scene within hours of the suicide attack, which destroyed key evidence that might have led to the real culprits.

The convicted officers, currently detained in Adiala jail, have challenged the sentence on three grounds.

Their appeal claimed that there was no evidence that they had actively participated in the terrorist attack. The prosecution could not prove “the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused” against the officers.

The appellants also maintained that Section 119 of the Pakistan Penal Code, which deals with “public servant[s] concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent”, could not be invoked against them on the basis of evidence brought before the court.

Published in Dawn, September 19th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.