A seesaw budget

Published May 27, 2017

If ever a federal budget came to us floating on the wings of hope, it is this latest one.

In its last fiscal year, the government has given us a budget that wants to eat its cake and have it too. Current expenditures have been restrained to an almost unrealistic extent, while development expenditures have seen their largest hike thus far.

On the revenue side, almost the entire burden of incremental revenues has been placed on the shoulders of domestic business enterprises, while the presentation of the budget emphasised the relief measures for industry. FBR revenues are being hiked by 14pc, whereas they have struggled to meet far humbler targets in the preceding years. Other revenue heads see modest increases.

Likewise, the current expenditure target for next year sees a modest hike of 2pc from last year’s target, whereas development expenditure sees a hike of 25pc.

If current expenditure can stay within the prescribed limits, and the FBR can live up to expectations, this budget might yet pan out. But that is a very big if.

The finance minister went to some lengths to tout the achievements of his government, and he chose to compare today’s performance with fiscal year 2012-2013, the year before his government took office.

Amongst the boasts he laid before the parliament was one about “far-reaching structural reforms”, especially in the tax machinery, making it “more equitable and efficient”. This budget will put that boast to the supreme test.

Even in the area of subsidies, where targets set for last year were overshot by almost 50pc for the tariff differential subsidy, this year they intend to keep that head at the same target as last year, and cut K-Electric’s tariff differential payment by 50pc. This means either passing through large tariff increases during the year to consumers, or working to bring about a miraculous recovery in collections.

The budget wants to expand programmes to give away goodies under vague plans like ‘Electricity for All’, at the same time pushing through large infrastructure projects including CPEC (which sees an allocation of Rs180bn in the development programme), while avoiding any revenue measures that could upset the masses or broaden the tax base.

The latter priority has largely dropped by the wayside, and many of the measures to penalise non-filers of income tax returns have turned into glorified revenue schemes.

It will be interesting to see how this government walks the tightrope it has set for itself in the year ahead. It is not known for its subtlety in dealings with the opposition, nor for taking an innovative approach to vexing policy problems that plague state finances. Yet the targets of this budget will test their balance to the hilt. A safe bet would be to expect many ad hoc course corrections along the way.

Published in Dawn, May 27th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Immunity gap
Updated 26 Apr, 2026

Immunity gap

Pakistan’s Big Catch-Up campaign showed progress but also exposed the scale of gaps in routine immunisation.
Danger on repeat
26 Apr, 2026

Danger on repeat

DISASTERS have typically been framed as acts of nature. Of late, they look increasingly like tests of preparedness...
Loose lips
26 Apr, 2026

Loose lips

PAKISTANIS have by now gained something of an international reputation for their gallows humour, but it seems that...
Lebanon truce
Updated 25 Apr, 2026

Lebanon truce

THE fact that the truce between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for three weeks should be welcomed. But there...
Terrorism again
25 Apr, 2026

Terrorism again

THE elimination of 22 terrorists in an intelligence-based operation in Khyber highlights both the scale and ...
Taxing technology
25 Apr, 2026

Taxing technology

THE recent decision by the FBR’s Directorate General of Customs Valuation to increase the ‘assessed value’ of...