ISLAMABAD: The federal government has rejected the Sindh government’s request for taking action against certain “suspected” seminaries, describing the information provided in this regard by the provincial authorities as “insufficient, ambiguous and without any credible evidence”.

Through a letter, the interior ministry has instead asked the Sindh government to inform the federal government of the action the provincial authorities have so far taken against the “suspected” seminaries, if it has any concrete evidence against them because taking action against such elements falls in the domain of the provincial governments.

“If there was any concrete evidence available against the people affiliated with these seminaries, then what action the provincial government, police and other law enforcement agencies have taken against them?” asked the letter whose contents in Urdu were released to the media by the ministry here on Thursday.


Terms information ‘incomplete and without concrete evidence’


Talking to reporters in his Parliament House chambers, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan had disclosed that the Sindh government, through a letter written to his ministry, had sought proscription of 94 ‘suspected’ religious seminaries.

Terming the provincial government’s move “ridiculous”, the minister had stated that it was for the provinces to take action against the suspected religious seminaries. He had also regretted that before the letter had reached the interior ministry, the Sindh chief minister had made a statement about it.

In its reply to the provincial government, the interior ministry has alleged that the “incomplete information” and “ambiguous language” of the Sindh government’s communication gives the impression that the letter has been written by the provincial authorities “with some political motives and to hide their own lapses” in the implementation of the National Action Plan (NAP) against terrorism.

Through the letter, the interior ministry has regretted that the list provided by the provincial authorities does not have complete addresses of the “suspected seminaries”, and even has the names of seminaries in other provinces, including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and Fata.

“The Sindh government’s request for action against the seminaries functioning outside its administrative control and outside its geographical boundaries and without any concrete evidence in incomprehensible,” says the letter, which adds: “Apparently, it seems that the provincial authorities have not fully studied the legal requirements for proscribing any organisation.” The ministry has “advised” the Sindh government “to remain confined to its geographical limits” and provide “credible” information, keeping in mind that “every action against seminaries requires legal justification”.

The interior minister has been facing criticism from leaders of the main opposition Pakistan People’s Party, which is the ruling party in Sindh, for the past many months over his alleged failure to fully implement the NAP against terrorism.

Published in Dawn, January 13th, 2017

Opinion

Awaiting orders
25 Oct 2021

Awaiting orders

Orders are given for demolition. Some structures go down. Some still stand.
Is it our own?
25 Oct 2021

Is it our own?

It is fair to ask what truly determines our success.
Up, up and away
Updated 25 Oct 2021

Up, up and away

Irate Twitterati want Superman to stop meddling.
No-trust resolution dynamics
Updated 24 Oct 2021

No-trust resolution dynamics

It is heartening that the effort to remove a chief minister is following constitutional norms.

Editorial

25 Oct 2021

Party to a vile campaign

THE PTI government’s hostility towards the media and its intolerance for dissent is well known. The target of ...
Financial crisis
Updated 25 Oct 2021

Financial crisis

DESPITE having progressed to ‘very good step’ and being ‘close to concluding the agreement’ a few days back,...
25 Oct 2021

Morals and Pemra

TIME and again, Pemra has come under fire for issuing arbitrary instructions to TV channels on matters ranging from...
Anti-government rallies
Updated 24 Oct 2021

Anti-government rallies

Banning a party because it can create a public nuisance sets a dangerous precedent which can be repeated to justify future bans.
24 Oct 2021

End of polio?

AFTER a long struggle, the reward is finally in sight. With only a single case of wild poliovirus reported this year...
24 Oct 2021

Heritage work

IT is encouraging that, slowly, projects of heritage conservation and preservation appear to be taking off. These...