ISLAMABAD: The recent scandal of Mufti Qavi and Qandeel Baloch echoed in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) when the defence counsel in the Haj corruption case asked the court for concession for the former religious affairs minister Hamid Saeed Kazmi for being a religious scholar.

IHC Chief Justice Mohammad Anwar Khan Kasi remarked that people were witnessing what religious scholars were up to nowadays.

Mr Kazmi who hails from Multan, became federal minister in the previous PPP government and has been convicted in the Haj corruption case.


IHC judge refuses to show leniency towards religious scholars


During the hearing of appeals filed by Kazmi and other accused persons including director general Haj Rao Shakeel and former joint secretary Ministry of Religious Affairs Abdul Islam Raja, Kazmi’s counsel Sardar Latif Khan Khosa requested the court to be lenient towards his client as he is a known religious scholar.

Though the IHC chief justice did not name Qandeel and Mufti Qavi, the defence counsel Advocate Khosa, who belongs to Balochistan, guessed whom he was referring to.

Mufti Qavi faced a lot of criticism after pictures and a video of him with social media personality Qandeel Baloch appeared on various social media sites. The incident made headlines and led to the suspension of Muft Qavi’s membership from the Ruet-i-Hilal Committee as well as from the National Ulema Mushaikh Council.

The counsel then clarified to the IHC chief justice, who comes from the same province, that Qandeel is not a Baloch and hails from elsewhere.

Media reports suggest that Qandeel belongs to Shah Sadruddin village in the Dera Ghazi Khan district of southern Punjab.

Before the IHC CJ, Advocate Khosa argued that Kazmi was not responsible for the appointment of Rao Shakeel as Director General Haj.

He said that the arrangement of temporary residences for pilgrims was also not minister for Haj’s responsibility and that the federal secretary of the ministry was to deal with these matters.

The court said the appeals will be decided judiciously and after hearing the argument of other parties in the matter. Since the prosecutor of the Federal Investigation Agency Mohammad Azhar Chaudhry was not available to argue the prosecution’s case, the matter was adjourned till June 29.

Published in Dawn, June 28th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Population calamity
Updated 22 Jul, 2024

Population calamity

Pakistan can also control its growth rate by following the examples of its peers and implementing functional family planning programmes and campaigns.
Blow to occupation
22 Jul, 2024

Blow to occupation

THE International Court of Justice has delivered a legal blow to the decades-old Israeli occupation of Palestinian...
Seeking Priya Kumari
22 Jul, 2024

Seeking Priya Kumari

PRIYA Kumari — the minor girl who vanished on Ashura in 2021 while serving water at a sabeel in Sukkur district ...
Olympics contingent
21 Jul, 2024

Olympics contingent

FROM 10 in Tokyo the last time, it is now down to seven in Paris, and split across just three disciplines. When...
Grave concerns
21 Jul, 2024

Grave concerns

PUNJAB Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz’s open assault on the Supreme Court for ruling in favour of the PTI in the...
Civil unrest
Updated 21 Jul, 2024

Civil unrest

The government must start putting out fires instead of fanning more flames.