India says Koh-i-Noor diamond belongs to Britain

Published April 18, 2016
The Kohinoor, or "mountain of light," diamond, set in the Maltese Cross at the front of the crown made for Britain's late Queen Mother Elizabeth. ─AP/File
The Kohinoor, or "mountain of light," diamond, set in the Maltese Cross at the front of the crown made for Britain's late Queen Mother Elizabeth. ─AP/File

NEW DELHI: The priceless Koh-i-Noor, which is a part of Queen Elizabeth's crown, was given to Britain and not stolen, India's government on Monday told the Supreme Court, which is hearing a suit seeking its return.

The 108-carat Koh-i-Noor gem, which came into British hands during the colonial era, is the subject of a historic ownership dispute and has been claimed by at least four countries including Pakistan and India.

But India's Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar said the 19th-century Sikh king Ranjit Singh had given the stone to the British.

Related: Bhutto approached UK over Kohinoor: documents

“It was given voluntarily by Ranjit Singh to the British as compensation for help in the Sikh Wars. The Koh-i-Noor is not a stolen object,” he told the Supreme Court.

The court was hearing a suit filed by the All India Human Rights & Social Justice Front, a non-governmental organisation, seeking the diamond's return.

It asked the solicitor general to file an affidavit giving the government's stance on the issue.

The stone was presented to Queen Victoria in 1850 after the Anglo-Sikh wars in which Britain gained control of the Sikh empire of the Punjab, which is now split between Pakistan and India.

Singh in turn had taken it from an Afghan king who had sought sanctuary in India.

The diamond had been an heirloom of the Afghan monarchy and before then was in Persian royal hands, but its true origins remain a mystery.

Its name translates as “Mountain of Light” and it is traditionally worn by a queen – it is said to bring bad luck to any man who wears it.

In 1976 Britain refused a request to cede the diamond, citing the terms of the Anglo-Sikh peace treaty.

“I could not advise Her Majesty the Queen that it should be surrendered,” said Jim Callaghan, prime minister at the time.

It must be mentioned here that Pakistan has never backtracked from its claim over the gem and the Lahore High Court is regularly hearing a petition filed by a lawyer, who maintains that Queen Elizabeth has no right to have the Koh-i-Noor diamond as it was a cultural heritage of Punjab and its citizens owned it.

Earlier this month, LHC reserved its verdict on the case and maintainability of the petition.

Related: Verdict reserved on maintainability of Koh-i-Noor plea

Opinion

Fussing about the wrong things
11 May 2021

Fussing about the wrong things

By bringing down a few pieces of bronze or concrete can we drive away the sinister spectre of racism and other prejudices?
Shadow soldiers
10 May 2021

Shadow soldiers

Today, there are mercenary armies that make Blackwater look like babies.

Editorial

11 May 2021

Kabul massacre

AFGHANISTAN is a land that has seen plenty of massacres during decades of unrest. However, despite this almost...
11 May 2021

Divisive move

THE electoral reforms process is off to a bad start. After weeks of wrangling with the opposition, the government ...
11 May 2021

Bank loan concerns

THE combined gross non-performing loan portfolio of the country’s banks and DFIs increased marginally by 2.6pc or...
10 May 2021

Safe havens

THE pull-out of foreign forces from Afghanistan has security ramifications for that country as well as neighbouring...
10 May 2021

Important bills

AT last, there is some movement on critical legislation that appeared to have been put on the back-burner. The...
Al Aqsa clashes
Updated 10 May 2021

Al Aqsa clashes

US policy remains wedded to blind support for the Jewish state.