CARACAS: Venezuela plunged into a confusing political deadlock this week. The opposition took control of the country’s legislature but the government vowed to block its reforms.

Here is an analysis of the different players in the institutional stand-off, their strategic positions, and hazards in the recession-hit, oil-producing state.

Government

After 17 years in control, President Nicolas Maduro’s socialist PSUV party has lost the National Assembly legislature to the centre-right opposition, which is vowing to get rid of him and reform the economy.

But Maduro is seen as holding sway over the Supreme Court, where a legal battle is likely to play out. His side has applied to it to annul the assembly’s reforms.

“The government has chosen the path of outright confrontation, raising once again the prospect of serious political violence,” wrote Phil Gunson, an analyst with the International Crisis Group.

Meanwhile sceptics say Maduro’s appointment of socialist hardliners to economic posts in a cabinet reshuffle this week bodes ill for change.

Military

The military could hold the key to resolving deadlock in a country prone to unrest.

The defence minister and head of the armed forces, General Vladimir Padrino, pledged the military’s “absolute loyalty and unconditional support” for Maduro.

“The armed forces is a complex institution and its behaviour in the event of a political crisis of such scale is difficult to predict,” said Diego Moya-Ocampos, a London-based Venezuelan analyst with research group IHS Country Risk.

“The armed forces will play a key role behind the scenes. Crucially they will prevent any confrontation between Venezue­lans or between pro-government and opposition groups.”

Opposition

The opposition coalition MUD swore in a two-thirds majority in the assembly after winning December’s elections.

However Maduro supporters say that “super-majority” — which is large enough to give the opposition the power to launch constitutional measures to oust the president — is not legitimate.

LONG at odds with Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chavez, Washington has called for a “transparent” resolution to the political crisis in Venezuela.—AFP
LONG at odds with Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chavez, Washington has called for a “transparent” resolution to the political crisis in Venezuela.—AFP

Their claim is based on the fact that the Supreme Court has suspended three opposition lawmakers pending allegations of electoral fraud.

“The institutional crisis between the government and the legislature will escalate further as the MUD and the PSUV struggle to control the Supreme Court,” said Moya-Ocampos.

He said the deadlock will likely cause instability and a worsening of economic hardship for ordinary Venezuelans.

Venezuelan people

December’s vote was widely seen as punishment for the government by an electorate fed up with economic chaos.

“People are hoping their problems will be solved, but if the days go by and things go on like this, social tension will be exacerbated,” said Asdrubal Oliveros, of Venezuelan research group Ecoanalitica.

The plunging price of oil has hit Venezuela’s foreign revenues.

Venezuelans are having to queue for hours to buy rations of cooking oil, toilet paper and other basics.

Domestic worker Gilma Vasquez said she voted to “end the queues”. But in the current deadlock, she says, “I am afraid that nothing will change.”

International community

The United States and Venezuela’s Latin American neighbours are watching closely.

Before the elections the United Nations expressed concern for jailed opposition leaders and the independence of the judiciary.

Long at odds with Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chavez, Washington has called for a “transparent” resolution.

Maduro’s Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delcy Rodriguez rejected that as “interference”. The Organization of American States called for “dialogue and peace”. Its leader Luis Almagro warned Maduro against “distorting the voice of the people” after the vote.

“The fact that the opposition was able to achieve a peaceful, democratic change of leadership in the Venezuelan parliament may suggest there is light at the end of the country’s tunnel,” wrote Gunson.

“But for now no one can be sure it is not the headlight of an oncoming train.”—AFP

Published in Dawn, January 10th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....
Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...