Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

File photo shows policemen escort identified missing persons .—AFP/File
File photo shows policemen escort identified missing persons .—AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court directed the federal government on Monday to come up with details in 10 days about the number of missing persons in the country.

The directive was issued by a two-judge bench headed by Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja which had taken up an application of Nasrullah Baloch, Chairman of the Voice of Baloch Missing Persons, seeking an order for his protection.

During the hearing, Mr Baloch alleged that the mutilated bodies found in different areas of Balochistan were buried within two or three days instead of handing them over to the families. The identity of these defaced bodies, he said, remained a mystery and even their relatives would not recognise them if handed over.

Also read: 122 ‘missing persons’ traced in Balochistan in three years

He regretted that there was no mortuary to preserve such bodies and said that earlier the Bolan Medical Complex in Quetta had such a facility but it had been closed down.

The court asked the advocate general of Balochistan to submit a report on the procedure of handing over such bodies to the families and the number of hospitals and mortuaries functioning in the province. The other three provinces have also been directed to submit similar reports.

Describing the enforced disappearances as a national issue, Justice Khawaja said the matter must be addressed amicably.

The court directed Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt to submit comprehensive data about the number of missing persons in the country.

According to media reports, the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances (CIED) was seized with 1,265 cases as of Dec 31. But the Defence of Human Rights (DHR) claims that the total number of cases of missing persons is 5,149 and 252 of them surfaced in 2014 alone.

The attorney general informed the bench that the federal government would submit its reply to the questions the court had framed on May 15 last year whenever the matter was taken up by a larger bench requiring determination whether a serving military officer accused of offences under ordinary laws should be tried by criminal courts or military courts.

During the hearing of a case on June 5 last year, Justice Khawaja had requested the then chief justice to consider constituting a five-judge larger bench to find answers to the questions the court had framed while hearing a case of 35 prisoners who had gone missing from a military internment centre in Malakand.

The request was sent to the chief justice when the court’s attention was drawn to the pendency of a number of cases of missing persons in at least four other benches of the Supreme Court.

The questions framed by the court asked when a person is accused of committing an offence under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and that person is serving in the Pakistan Army, is it the ordinary criminal forum/courts set up under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) that will try the offender or is it for the forums under the Pakistan Army Act (PAA) 1952 to try such an accused?

Secondly, the court asked, whether the ordinary criminal courts (the courts at Malakand) are obliged to accede to the request made by the army authorities or is it within the discretion of the ordinary courts to determine whether or not to allow the request of the army authorities for the transfer of the case to them.

And thirdly, if it is for the ordinary forums to exercise discretion in the matter of a request received from the army authorities, what is the basis on which such a request should be considered and then accepted or declined.

The court formulations had come against the backdrop of the March 25, 2014 letter written by the General Commanding Officer (GOC) Headquarters 17 Division Operational Area Swat to the District Commissioner Malakand after the registration of FIR No 11 of March 20 against Naib Subedar Amanullah Baig along with his other colleagues posted at the Army Fort Malakand on behalf of Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif in the Levy Post Malakand of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa under Section 346 of the PPC for removing the 35 missing persons from the Malakand internment centre.

The GOC letter had asked the Malakand DC to transfer the case papers to the army authorities. The accused had not yet been arrested. Subsequently on March 28, the DC replied to the GOC that the case had been closed and its documents dispatched to the army authorities.

The court had held that to ensure uniform consideration of these questions, it might be appropriate that these cases be heard by a larger bench and all such matters (missing persons’ cases) be fixed before the same bench. “We should not have two or three different opinions on similar issues,” it had observed.

Published in Dawn January 13th , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Most Popular

Comments (5) Closed

Hasan Hasni Jan 13, 2015 07:53am

Cant Supreme Court have a quiet chat with agencies and find out reasons of disappearances without making public or other groups are involved.

Amjad Wyne Jan 13, 2015 08:28am

Here is what I do not understand... here are these judges that cannot decide on simple cases for years...many cases have been languishing in courts for decades and they turn around and give everyone else one day, two days, ten come up with facts. No wonder they get garbage in response. May be it is a deliberate behavior. Ask for garbage, then get the garbage and then claim, "look, we got the garbage so we have to let the criminals off the hook".

law Jan 13, 2015 12:08pm

Better if SC could provide justice to Peshawar school attack victims instead of creating hurdles. Its a matter of shame.

law Jan 13, 2015 12:13pm

Supreme court judges can travel in mercedees on tax payers money but they are defending enemies of Pakistan,its time for every loyal pakistani to stand up against this courupt judicial system.

IBN E ASHFAQUE Jan 13, 2015 01:51pm

The courts because they have not provided justice within acceptable time periods are becoming redundant. Hence the advent of the military courts to fill the vacuum. However, not only the courts but the politicians and soon the press will also become redundant as they are not providing the services to ordinary citizens of Pakistan. The armed forces cannot take place of the courts, politicians as well as the press. It will be untenable even for them. The only option is to reform the court system starting from the lower courts right away. May Allah guide us all.