Nawaz and Imran

Published August 30, 2014

MOST political parties, with good standing among the people, have refused to support Imran Khan’s ill-considered agenda and his ‘Azadi March’.

They assume that this agitational politics would derail Pakistan from the path of democracy. The question is, if Mr Khan has no political standing and if his demands are unconstitutional, why are people supporting him? Why have the PTI’s rallying slogan of ‘change’ and PAT’s battle cry of ‘revolution’ become political buzzwords?

His initial demand was for recounting and audit of votes cast at four specific constituencies. It was a fair demand, but the government did not pay heed. Thus, he not only mounted pressure on the government by bringing along thousands of protesters to challenge the legitimacy of the incumbent government, but also raised a question mark about a political system that to many a person seems to be flawed and which allows corrupt politicians to come to power through the rigging of an election.

He asserted that the political system is monopolised by a few. The electoral system is not transparent and prevents true public representation.

While there is weight in his criticism, Mr Khan has committed a number of political blunders also, such as encouraging his opponents to misinterpret and misrepresent his movement.

His way of challenging the media, the government, and the Constitution and, most importantly, his unsubstantiated accusations against the judiciary isolated him.

His demand for the prime minister’s resignation prompted widespread criticism against him, as it seemed irrational from the legal point of view. His next blunder was to call for civil disobedience. This damaged his image. On the other hand, Prime Minister Nwaz Sharif strengthened his position in the public eye by giving conciliatory leeway to the marchers, in order to avoid riots and violence.

He did not order security forces to clear the streets, rather he showed patience to wear the protesters down. Thus, out of the 12 political parties in parliament, 11 have given their support to the prime minister.

On the other hand, the Sharif brothers should have realised that the reformation of the political system is way overdue and needs to be carried out on a war-footing if the system is to survive and deliver.

Tasmia Tahera

Islamabad

Published in Dawn, August 30th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

More pledges
Updated 25 May, 2024

More pledges

There needs to be continuity in economic policies, while development must be focused on bringing prosperity to the masses.
Pemra overreach
25 May, 2024

Pemra overreach

IT seems, at best, a misguided measure and, at worst, an attempt to abuse regulatory power to silence the media. A...
Enduring threat
25 May, 2024

Enduring threat

THE death this week of journalist Nasrullah Gadani, who succumbed to injuries after being attacked by gunmen, is yet...
IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...