Modi’s Kashmir concerns

Published August 14, 2014
Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. — Photo by AFP
Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. — Photo by AFP

The issue of Kashmir is a perennial lightning rod in the subcontinent. Whenever leaders in both India and Pakistan wish to burnish their nationalist credentials, jingoistic references are made about the troubled territory.

In a similar vein, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi used a visit to Leh — his second to India-held Kashmir after securing the top slot — to slam Pakistan and revive memories of 1999’s Kargil imbroglio. Speaking to the Indian troops, Mr Modi castigated Pakistan for engaging “in a proxy war” while he recalled the infiltration of Kargil.

Considering his audience — Indian military personnel — it can safely be said that Mr Modi was playing to the gallery. While there has been some militant activity in India-held Kashmir, the most recent incident being an ambush of troops near Srinagar, as well as cross-LoC trading of fire by both militaries, Mr Modi knows there is no comparison with the situation that existed two decades ago.

At the height of the Kashmir insurgency in the late ’80s and throughout much of the ’90s, hundreds of deaths were reported every year from the held territory, including a high civilian death toll. Today there is no such parallel; instead, there is a feeling of isolation from India in Kashmir and periodic waves of unrest — much of this is due to the harsh laws in place in the region as well as the heavy Indian military presence.

Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. And we must accept that Kashmir remains an unresolved issue.

Pakistan’s Foreign Office, while criticising the Indian prime minister, said Islamabad seeks “good, neighbourly relations” with India. Both countries must realise that good neighbours discuss their differences in a calm, logical manner and do not go about accusing each other in public.

If India has concerns about infiltration — which is indeed unacceptable — it needs to communicate these via diplomatic channels. Issuing combative statements only makes the resolution of outstanding issues all the more difficult.

Published in Dawn, August 14th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s unease
24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

THE first round of ‘engagement’ between Pakistan and the IMF over the former’s request for a larger and longer...
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...
Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...