ISLAMABAD: Against the backdrop of perceived rift between the political and military leadership, Supreme Court Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani cautioned on Thursday that the biggest challenge confronted by the country today was striking a delicate balance between human rights, individual liberties and national security.

“Pakistan’s future is dependent on how we deal with this challenge,” the chief justice said while speaking at a dinner hosted in honour of Justice Khilji Arif Hussain who is reaching superannuation on April 12. The ceremony was held at the ceremonial hall inside the Supreme Court building.

The statement came two days after a strongly-worded message by Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif that the military would “resolutely preserve” its dignity and Defence Minister Khawaja Asif calling parliament the most powerful institution of the country and suggesting to guard it from being trampled by any other institution.

“What the chief justice has said is in fact the need of the hour since Pakistan is certainly under attack from different sides, be it Taliban or insurgencies in different regions of the country,” commented Advocate Tariq Mehmood who was also present at the dinner.

He said the chief justice had rightly hinted at respecting and preserving the dignity of every institution, be it judiciary, executive or military.

“Today Pakistan is at a crossroad and facing its existential threat,” the chief justice said, adding that the biggest challenge faced by the judiciary was maintaining an equilibrium between constitutional guarantees like personal freedom, preservation of human rights and taking care of national security at the same time at this crucial juncture when the country was at a war for its survival.

ELECTION TRIBUNALS: Meanwhile, a three-judge Supreme Court bench headed by the chief justice hinted at examining whether the election tribunals and retuning officers (ROs) were competent to disqualify anyone in view of Article 62 (1 f) of the Constitution which disqualifies a person to be elected as a member of parliament if he is not sagacious, righteous, non-profligate, honest and ameen.

Hearing petitions filed by parliamentarians belonging to Balochistan against ROs and decisions of election tribunals, the bench appointed Makhdoom Ali Khan and Ali Zafar as amici curiae to assist the court in determining whether ROs and tribunals could be called the court of law and could disqualify anyone under Article 62 (1 f).

“This confusion is causing ramification throughout the country,” the chief justice observed.

Opinion

Editorial

Dark days
Updated 26 May, 2022

Dark days

The PTI, on its part, does not seem to have been prepared to face such a large deployment of state machinery.
26 May, 2022

No room for dissent

WHILE political turmoil roils the land, a number of incidents over the past few days have demonstrated that though...
26 May, 2022

Harassing passengers

REPORTS of the confiscation of personal items from passengers’ private luggage by customs officials at Karachi’s...
Back to bedlam
Updated 25 May, 2022

Back to bedlam

FEAR tactics have never worked in the past, and most likely will not this time either. The government’s ...
25 May, 2022

Balochistan blaze

THE forest fire on the Koh-i-Sulaiman range in Balochistan’s Shirani area is among a series of blazes to have...
25 May, 2022

Unequal citizens

INDIFFERENCE would have been bad enough, but the state’s attitude towards non-Muslims falls squarely in the...