Karzai accuses US of cutting Afghan military supplies

Published
2

KABUL: Afghan President Hamid Karzai accused his US ally on Sunday of withholding military supplies to press him to sign a bilateral security deal that will shape the US military presence after most foreign troops leave in 2014.

Washington, which swiftly denied the assertion, has said that unless the pact is signed promptly, it could pull out mostof its troops, as it did in Iraq two years ago.

“The cutting of fuel supplies and support services to the Afghan army and police is being used as a means of pressure to ensure Afghanistan ... signs the Bilateral Security Agreement,”a statement from Karzai's palace said.

Karzai said last week he might refuse to sign the deal until after Afghanistan's presidential election in April 2014.

US officials said logistical problems in Pakistan might have given rise to the alleged delays in deliveries.

“There has been no stoppage in the delivery of requested fuel and we continue to process all orders as soon as they are received,” the Nato-led force in Afghanistan said in a statement.

Karzai's relationship with the United States has worsened since he invited thousands of elders to vote on the security deal last week and then ignored their advice, which was to sign it promptly.

Even after the pact's terms were settled after about a year of wrangling, Karzai has since added conditions that include the release of all Afghan prisoners from Guantanamo Bay in Cuba and an end to military operations involving Afghan homes.

On Thursday Karzai denounced his Western allies for bombing an Afghan home and killing a child, an accusation the Nato-led force has promised to investigate.

If the bilateral pact is not signed, Western aid running to billions of dollars will be in jeopardy and confidence in thefragile economy could collapse amid fears that Afghanistan will slip back into ethnic fighting or civil war.

Diplomats said Karzai may have overplayed his hand, raising the risk of a complete US withdrawal from a country where western troops have fought Taliban militants for the past 12 years.

Karzai's domestic critics say he is playing a dangerous game with Afghanistan's future security.

The decade-long security deal would mandate the size and shape of the US military presence in Afghanistan once the Nato combat mission ends next year. Without it, the United States would be unable to keep troops in Afghanistan, and most other nations would be likely to withdraw theirs too.

Afghanistan faces a potent Taliban insurgency and is still training its own military.

Opinion

Editorial

Terrorist havens
07 Aug, 2026

Terrorist havens

DESPITE the use of both carrots and sticks by the international community, the Afghan Taliban refuse to cut their...
Mineral wealth
07 Aug, 2026

Mineral wealth

GROWING American interest in Pakistan’s critical minerals is no longer speculative. According to US diplomats,...
Growth denied
07 Aug, 2026

Growth denied

THE Sindh government’s agreement with the World Bank to combine health, nutrition, sanitation, social protection...
Need for dialogue
06 Aug, 2026

Need for dialogue

THE interior minister’s comments at an Islamabad seminar last week have sparked many a conversation about the ...
Bad press
06 Aug, 2026

Bad press

THE government’s move to impose restrictions on international media will not only alienate the foreign press, it...
Automobile concerns
06 Aug, 2026

Automobile concerns

PAKISTAN’S automobile industry is at a critical juncture. Sharp cuts in tariffs on the import of completely built...