Suspension of licence

Published June 8, 2014

A MONTH and a half since the Geo-ISI controversy erupted, Pemra has finally delivered its verdict: Geo News has been suspended for 15 days and a multi-million rupee fine has been imposed. Leave aside whether the decision was right or wrong for a minute and focus on the procedure adopted. Unlike the earlier attempt by some Pemra members to hijack the verdict against Geo while the channel was being muscled off air by the powers-that-be via pressure on local cable providers, Friday’s verdict had an air of propriety to it. There were no theatrics, no grossly inappropriate statements, no attempt to overtly curry favour with certain institutions. Geo’s broadcast on April 19 after the attack on Hamid Mir in Karachi clearly did contravene many of the basics of fair and responsible journalism. Whatever the heightened emotions of that day and the long-standing suspicions about the army-led intelligence apparatus, some transgressions were committed. Whether those actions ought to have been punished with a vitriolic campaign afterwards and now with a suspension of Geo News’s licence is a more debatable issue.

What isn’t debatable though is the need for an overhaul of the electronic media’s regulatory system. Geo has been forced to pay for its mistakes, but day after day, news channels across the board routinely violate the most basic of rules of good and responsible journalism. Regulation is not the same as censorship. Because of its nature, the media has certain responsibilities and duties — both to the public it seeks to inform and the people and institutions it reports on. Sometimes, as happened when incendiary religious accusations were trotted out against Geo, the conduct of sections of the electronic media has been borderline criminal. Surely, better regulation — clearer rules, better enforcement, more transparency and fairness — is needed. The way ahead is also clear: the government can move parliament to consider a thorough re-examination of the existing Pemra-based regulatory framework and then, after meaningful consultation with the main stakeholders, a new regulator with new rules and new powers can be created. It can be done; indeed, it should be done.

Published in Dawn, June 8th, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...