Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Agreement yes, implementation no


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Thanks to the efforts of Avtar Singh Bhasin, a huge body of documents on India-Pakistan relations, running into 10 volumes, has been made available by the Ministry of External Affairs.

Brought out by Geetika Publishers with support from the Indian foreign ministry, the documents (1947-2007) are a definitive collection that could be used by historians, scholars and journalists to look closely at the twists and turns in India-Pakistan relations.

Mr. Bhasin, who retired from the Ministry of External Affairs as Director (Historical Division) after nearly three decades of service in 1993, has been quietly engaged in bringing hidden documents on a range of issues to public notice.

One usually depends on newspaper reports for accounts of meetings, but here many texts, records of meetings, letters and other documents have been made available in full.

There’s a lot to read and I haven’t even begun in earnest, but one document in the first volume immediately grabbed my attention.

It’s the “joint press code” adopted by the All-India Newspaper Editors’ Conference and the Pakistan Newspaper Editors’ Conference at its fourth meeting held on June 24-25, 1950.

The (India-Pakistan) Joint Press Committee “calls upon the Press of both countries to help to facilitate the further implementation of the Indo-Pakistan [Press] Agreement [of 1948]:-

(a)   By avoiding the dissemination of news calculated to undermine relations between the majority and minority communities in the two countries

(b) By refusing to give currency to mischievous opinion of individuals or organizations likely to rouse communal passions or create a sense of insecurity among the members of the minority community;

(c)  By rigorously excluding from the Press of each country opinion directed against the territorial sovereignty of the other or purporting to incite war;

(d)   By seeking through normal Press channels or Government Agencies verification of news or communal incidents before it is published.

(e) By always exercising due care and caution in regard to the publication of reports of communal incidents;

(f) By avoiding alarming headlines for reports of communal incidents;

(g) By exercising care in the publication of pictures and cartoons likely to excite communal passions;

(h) By affording full facilities to Governments for correction or contradiction of published reports.

The joint press code of 1950 was, clearly, enacted to ensure the post-Partition protection of minorities in India and Pakistan and to ensure that war-mongering in the media was reduced.

It’s an eminently sensible document designed to reduce media temperatures but, like so many other agreements between India and Pakistan, observed only in the breach.

Clearly, this agreement was never implemented or observed by the press in either India or Pakistan. The worst kinds of propaganda and “mischievous opinions” of individuals were given currency by the large majority of the media organisations both in print and radio in the early years after 1947.

Given the verbal volley-after-volley or the statement-rebuttal-statement policy style adopted by the politicians of India and Pakistan after independence, the press was also used as a tool to bolster competing, fragile national egos.

If for one moment we hold that the 1950 joint press code still remains valid, where would this leave the India-Pakistan media, with television, web and social media platforms added on, today?

To my mind, the record is a miserable one.

With a few honourable exceptions, the new TV-web world suffers from the same issues that the print-radio world did. In fact, television has definitely made it worse.

Our minds should just wander to what Indian television channels did after the decapitation of an Indian soldier some weeks ago. The anchors frothed at the mouth and shouted for revenge. There was no analysis or context – that such incidents – howsoever horrific – had happened before.

The fact that there are two Indian correspondents in Islamabad (The Hindu and Press Trust of India) and no Pakistani correspondent in New Delhi is commentary enough on the state of country-to-country “press relations”.

Many Indian journalists, for instance, talk to or quote the worst right-wingers in Pakistan. Similar is the case with most Pakistani commentators, who are brought on from Islamabad. Often, they are the biggest and known India-haters.

One can’t expect much change, but journalists of the day should spend a few minutes reading this joint press code.

It’s instructive. And places in sharp contest what we haven’t been doing.


Amit Baruah is an independent, Delhi-based journalist. He is the author of Dateline Islamabad and reported for The Hindu newspaper from Pakistan.


The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Author Image

Amit Baruah is an independent, Delhi-based journalist. He is the author of Dateline Islamabad and reported for The Hindu newspaper from Pakistan. He tweets @abaruah64.

The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Comments (11) Closed

Bilal Mar 05, 2013 12:43am
What has always been missing in Indo-Pak media is debate, facts, and reasoning. In fact, no one cares about facts, no one discusses the topic based on solid reasoning. In our part of the world, you simply say "India" or "Pakistan" and then play on naive, often misplaced, patriotism. This approach doesn't raise the standard of debate, it only serves as basis for mud-slinging and propaganda. Sadly, this is a recipe for "race towards the bottom" in terms of media standards. I can earnestly say that Dawn has quickly become my favorite newspaper online because it doesn't toe the line of government press releases or play on false patriotism. Keep up the good work!
G.A. Mar 04, 2013 07:45pm
Dawn really seems like an impartial paper when it comes to India and Pakistan relations. It has stories and comments from both sides including Pakistan-bashing from Pakistanis and non-Pakistanis alike. It is by far the best paper for mobile phones and beats the likes of BBC and other giants hands down for mobile readability and commenting. Kudos!
Sama Mar 04, 2013 06:05pm
Where Pakistani media is still showing some responsibility and standards, Indian media has completely lost its credibility for me. The way Indian media acted recently on the cross border firing (as mentioned above) was unbelievable. Pakistan media acted maturely during the cross border incident showing views of both sides and on the recent mishaps in sporting world (treatment of Pakistani hockey players in league, Pakistan blind cricketer captain, women team in India).
Silajit Mar 04, 2013 12:56pm
Not sure about "both sides". There is no Indian equivalent of the (establishment managed?) Lahore based Nation with such wide readership.
rahul Mar 04, 2013 10:42am
its easy to say all this crap unless some one of yours is killed...stop preaching courageless peace when clearly one side has a policy to destroy the other and when the the other side is on path of self destruction...india can only be in peace when our borders are strong.
Leo Mar 04, 2013 09:56am
Indian media of late has become more and more aggressive in approach with shrill debates without content. I wish our standard to improve ASAP as its very painful to seen journalism go down like this.
raika45 Mar 04, 2013 12:06pm
I am not an Indian [though my parents were] nor a Pakistani.A retired old man with time on hand, I go through Pakistani and Indian on line news. India has the upright no nonsense paper like the Hindu.Too much politics not much general people associated news. The times of India is a paper struggling to be either a serious newspaper [since it comes up with startling news] but judging by it's readers comments on other topics where all sorts of accusations and bad mouthing of Pakistan occurs.I am not on either side, but I believe that Dawn really gives a proper interpretation on situations and news regarding the two countries.I am not trying to curry favor, but the moderators have a good head on their shoulders.
alien brahmin Mar 05, 2013 07:07am
very true !
Fuzail Z. Ahmad Mar 05, 2013 07:20am
It is an excellent article but comments from Rahul are really heartbreaking. I am a proud reader of Dawn for its very balanced editorials/articles and often the Indians' negative comments on Pakistan greatly outnumber other comments. This article is another great one from an Indian writer and I am surprised that only Rahul has (so far) written with a bad taste. In Pakistan, bellicose, anti-India comments are from extreme right, who do not have many voters to put them in the National Assembly. Why should Indian media and public take them as comments from "Pakistan"?
Mia Mar 05, 2013 09:03am
yet indian media is far better and most widely read than pakistani media which has serous credibility issues .... indians newspapers are world faous n have worlds largest circulations....except dawn i am not sure there is any other credible news media in pakistan ...
Asif Kahsmiri Mar 05, 2013 11:23am
Fully agreed.