Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Does PIA need a chairman?


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

THIS is apropos of the notice issued by the Supreme Court to the defence secretary in the PIA case. There is always a mad race to become PIA chairman to enjoy lifetime free travel facility.

To be fair there is no need to appoint a chairman for PIA who also acts as chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority board.

What is required is to have a qualified managing director who is not a pilot and empowered. At present, the PIA managing director and director-general of the CAA are treated as just two officers who are politically appointed serving under the ministry of defence.

As a result, all decisions by the ruling elite have to be implemented. They are hardly allowed to work independently and, in fact, most of their time is consumed in answering queries and attending meetings in the ministry of defence.

Under the circumstances to blame PIA is not fair. Who does not know that 50 per cent of the employees are surplus, as observed by the apex court?

What is the justification for employing 17,000 people, excluding 2,734 daily wage earners, for a fleet of 45 aircraft out of which 28 are operational?

In most countries, CAAs work under ministries of transport, civil aviation or communications. There is a need to go through the report prepared in 1995 by M/s Arthur D. Little and NatWest on PIA. They recommended a separate ministry of aviation be set up and the CAA split into four companies so that its commercial and regulatory roles could be separated.

The CAA and ministry of defence opposed it but as a compromise agreed to set up a ministry of aviation only to wind it up after the Benazir government was dismissed.

In March 1999, Nawaz Sharif revived it but it was abolished by Gen Musharraf after the coup. It is hoped that the Supreme Court will take notice of these issues.


Comments (1) Closed

smhusain1 Jan 13, 2013 07:29am
There is certainly no need for a Chairman and Managing Director, but there is no harm in having a pilot as a Managing Director if he can be effective and knows his job. Any appointee will suffer at the hands of the Ministry or the politicians unless as the writer has suggested some fundamental changes are brought in to stop the meddling. The CAA is in a poorer shape and they have to set the pace. Definitely both entities need to come out of the Ministry's umbrella. One doesn't have to look far to realize that commercial aviation is having a bad time the world over and has never recovered financially since the price of kerosene went up in the late nineties. Observe closely India, where a major airline Kingfisher is fighting to stop their aircraft from being taken over by the lenders. You should note the woeful record of the rupee, how do you expect to bring a profit where there is no stable currency? Iberia, TAP, you name it, everybody is a disaster in the making.