Supreme Court of Pakistan
Supreme Court of Pakistan. — Photo by AFP

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday resumed the hearing of petitions against the recently passed contempt of court law, DawnNews reported.

A five-judge bench of the apex court comprising Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Shakirullah Jan, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Jawad S Khawaja and Justice Tassadduq Hussain Jilani was hearing the petitions against the law.

During the hearing, the petitioners and their counsels were arguing against the law.

Petitioner Liaquat Qureshi argued that the new contempt law was against the Islamic fundamentals, adding that the parliament had passed the law without adequate consideration.

Upon which, Chief Justice Iftikhar said that consultations and discussions do take place before the passing of any law.

Furthermore, addressing the petitioner, Justice Khawaja said that one should not rely on media reports in the absence of a record of parliamentary proceedings.

The petitioner also said that the opposition had staged a walk out from the parliament when the law was tabled.

Moreover, Justice Khawaja remarked that with the new law, an attempt had been made to provide immunity to the privileged class.

In his remarks, Chief Justice Iftikhar said that the new contempt of court law had even render Article 204 ineffective.

He moreover said that amending laws in a rush was not a good tradition. Laws are made for the public's well being and are not passed overnight.

Earlier outside the Supreme Court building, Attorney General Irfan Qadir said that the parliament had unlimited powers and that amendments passed by it could not be challenged.

Speaking to media representatives, the attorney general said that it was incorrect to say that the parliament could not reduce the powers bestowed upon the judiciary.

During Monday’s hearing, the court had observed that “the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court cannot be curtailed by the parliament by regulating the law”.

Moreover, the chief justice had observed that the Supreme Court always welcomed fair comments on judgments if made in a respectable manner while maintaining the dignity of the court as they became public property the moment they were delivered. “Public has a right to look into the judgments of the courts,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.