Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on Dawn.com.

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience

.

Email


Your Name:


Recipient Email:


Nowhere else is the gender gap more pronounced in Pakistan than in the income tax rolls where more than 99 per cent tax payers are listed as males.

With almost 50 per cent of the population, women account for less than 1 per cent of all income tax payers in Pakistan. The reason for women’s absence from income tax rolls perhaps lies in the manner women are integrated in the workforce. Women’s labour force participation rate in Pakistan is rather dismal at around 14.4 per cent. Bangladesh, on the other hand, reports a three-times higher rate than Pakistan for women’s participation in the labour force. Furthermore, women in Pakistan are often employed in low paying jobs or jobs that do not compensate monetarily. However, the above arguments fail to explain why fewer than 1 per cent income tax payers are women.

It is not that Pakistan lacks affluent women. There are several empowered, influential, and wealthy women in Pakistan such as Begum Abida Hussein (who represents the landed gentry), Sharmila Farooqi (who represents the new breed of female political mavericks), and Dr. Maleeha Lodhi (who represents the intellectual elite). Could it be true that this very visible minority of enfranchised women obscure the fact that despite their prominence they belong to a very small cohort which accounts for fewer than 1 per cent of the taxpayers in Pakistan. Or it is true that women are reluctant to file income tax in Pakistan.

While much has been written about tax evasion there are however few examples, if any, of research on those who in fact do file taxes in Pakistan. A recent paper by Professor Henrik Jacobsen Kleven and Mazhar Waseem of the London School of Economics is an exception in which the authors explore the behavioural motivations of tax payers in Pakistan.*

Relying on a database of those who filed the federal income tax during 2006-08 the authors explore the motivations of tax payers as they try to minimise their income tax charges. The data comes from the Federal Bureau of Revenue and comprises the entire population of personal income tax filings by individuals or their employers.

Despite being a nation of 180 million, on average merely one million individual income taxes are filed annually in Pakistan. The registered tax payers in Pakistan represent just 2 per cent of the working age population. This explains why the income taxes account for only 1.1 per cent of Pakistan’s economy. With such poor revenue generation from domestic sources, the government has perhaps no other option but to borrow from international donors to keep the wheel of life churning in Pakistan.

Pakistan’s tax code categorises income earners as wage earners, i.e., those who work for an employer, and self-employed individuals. For wage earners, it is possible to obtain third-party verification of earned income from the employers to prevent under-reporting of income. On the other hand, there is no possibility of independent income verification of self-employed individuals and thus short of an audit self-reported revenue is treated as final.

The lack of third party verification and the very structure of the tax system makes it vulnerable to exploitation. The tax rate in Pakistan is devised such that it increases with income. Thus a self-employed individual earning more than 200,000 rupees is charged a 5 per cent tax rate whereas another person earning more than 300,000 rupees is charged a 7.5 per cent tax rate.

Since the incomes of self-employed individuals, who constitute 50 per cent of all income tax payers, cannot be verified independently they may be tempted to underreport incomes to avoid higher taxes. Thus, one would expect a sudden increase in the number of tax payers for tax brackets before the tax rate increases. Keleven and Waseem in there analysis reveal how tax payers in Pakistan have systematically underreported their incomes, which leads to a sudden jump in the number of tax payers in certain tax brackets.

The following figure illustrates the systematic underreporting of income in Pakistan. Since the tax rate increases by 2.5 per cent at an annual income of greater than 300,000 rupees, there is a sudden hike in the number of tax payers who stated their income to be 300,000 rupees or slightly less. This phenomenon is repeated for every income tax bracket where the tax rate increases resulting in significant loss in tax revenue to the government.

Another quirk in the tax system is the differential tax rate structure for wage earners and self-employed workers where the former are subjected to significantly lower tax rates. Thus for the same level of income wage earners are taxed at a lower rate than the self-employed workers. Furthermore, the tax system treats the individual either as a wage earner or self-employed such that if one reports 50 per cent or more income from self-employed sources, one is considered a self-employed worker and is taxed at a higher rate. The differential treatment leads to further leakage in the tax revenue where individuals try to shift self-employed earnings to wages to claim lower income tax rates.

In Pakistan, where a large number of workers are illiterate or innumerate, many find the current income tax structure complex because of several income brackets and unintuitive tax exemptions. Wage earners are divided into 20 income brackets and self-employed workers are spread over 14 income brackets. At the lowest income level women are exempted for a larger amount than men. The tax system further exempts various key sources of income, such as capital gains, pension, and agriculture-based income. Moreover, wage earners earning less than 500,000 rupees are exempted from filing taxes.

There is an urgent need to streamline the tax code in Pakistan to address the systematic underreporting of incomes. At the same time, Pakistan has to find ways to involve more women in the labour force. Bangladesh and India have done much better in integrating women into the labour force. Pakistan should learn from Bangladesh in empowering its women. If women are continued to be forced to the sideline, there is little hope of an economic miracle in Pakistan. Remember, Pakistan needs women workers to raise productivity and income tax revenue.

*Kleven, Henry Jacobsen and Mazhar Waseem. (May 2011). Tax notches in Pakistan: Tax evasion, real responses, and income shifting.

Murtaza Haider, Ph.D. is the Associate Dean of research and graduate programs at the Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University in Toronto.  He can be reached by email at murtaza.haider@ryerson.ca

The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.


Author Image

Murtaza Haider is a Toronto-based academic and the director of Regionomics.com.

He tweets @regionomics


The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.


Comments (21) Closed



Asad Shairani Sep 21, 2011 03:03pm
Not very sure about the tax percentages table. Last I checked, individuals having an annual income more than Rs8MM were in the 20% tax bracket. Rs. 1.3M annual in Pakistan is not that high an income to pay 25% tax anyway.
john mcguire Sep 21, 2011 03:22pm
where is the question of income tax in an islamic country. zakt is mandatory as prescribed in the quran
Patak Sep 21, 2011 03:57pm
If Pakistan moves to a cashless economy, everybody gets a tax ID, and all transactions are linked to the ID, the tax evasion problem can be minimized.
shafi Sep 21, 2011 05:42pm
To John, It is true that Zakat is mandatory but it is levied on the total assets which in Pakistan you can never calculate correctly.
Khalid Sep 21, 2011 06:18pm
If CNIC Number becomes the income tax number, whereby every Pakistani automatically comes on the tax roster from the day he/she attains the age of 18, then only we will be able to get rid of corruption...
jd shami Sep 21, 2011 09:59pm
Mr. Haider: You must understand that vast majority of women do not work in Pakistan, so how they can pay Tax.
zulfiqar khaki of da Sep 21, 2011 10:26pm
An eye opener article! Murtaza Haider did great job.
Aqeel Jafri Sep 21, 2011 10:33pm
Does anybody knows if overseas Pakistanis are required to "file" their income tax return??? In certain countries, such as Canada, all citizens, regardless of whether they are currently residing in Canada or not have to file the income tax. any comments.
Nasir Sayani Sep 21, 2011 10:54pm
Here is the problem, our government is not so transperent and therefore most people do not trust them with the money, as currupt as our leaders are where do you think our tax money will be going?
Pakyoungers Sep 22, 2011 07:49am
Women who are working in their home is not added in GDP. Approximately all the landlords are not paying text even the Prim minster. Even the news channels are Tex defaulters.
Nabeel Sep 22, 2011 10:11am
Great piece of research!
Rizwan Afridi Sep 22, 2011 11:36pm
Why are you focusing on women when none of our parliamentarians even pay?
gp65 Sep 23, 2011 02:03am
The question could be rephrased as 'Where are the taxpayers in Pakistan' to take gender out of the equation. Yourown article indicates that only 1 million Pakistanis file taxes. This seems to indicate that even male Pakistanis are pretty reluctant to pay taxes.
Imran Ali Muhammad S Sep 23, 2011 03:05pm
where is the question of income tax in an islamic country. zakt is mandatory as prescribed in the quran. An eye opener article! Murtaza Haider did great job. I am proud of you . I will pray for you will go to successfully. Take cre.
stonwall Sep 25, 2011 11:55am
why pay taxes when the government is going to drain all that money down the toilet anyway?
Kami Sep 25, 2011 04:35pm
Instead of chanting for Sharia laws,which is not practiced in our counry, women shiould pay tax. and people trying to protect women from tax are mostly those whose spouse or relative Income Falls under tax braket. Every one should elegible person should pay tax Like Indirect tax.
Kami Sep 25, 2011 04:39pm
very correct... but i guess tax shall be levied on the person whose bank balance exceeds basic exemption amount... because now a days every body has his bank account so with this authorities can also collect more and more tax...
stonwall Sep 25, 2011 09:15pm
The reason not a lot of women pay taxes could be that they don't have any money, officially. They're happy with the fact that their husbands/fathers own everything. They mostly stick to taking care of the household.
ahmed Sep 29, 2011 10:56am
There is no doubt, only two percent of Pakistan's working population paid (direct tax) income tax but we should also keep in mind that, almost each and every Pakistani paid (indirect tax) sale tax.
Nasah Oct 01, 2011 08:37am
It is like putting the cart before the horse -- first of all get the woman out of the kitchen -- then get her a job which pays above the minimum wage with an annual salary above the nontaxable poverty line -- then count the number of dependents on her income -- subtract them from the total income -- THEN check if her remaining income is still within the tax-paying bracket -- if no, no taxes if yes then send the notice.
sana yasin Oct 03, 2011 09:57am
Nice Article.Being a working women i pay my taxes.Unfortunately what we pay becomes history.Its useless to pay taxes where their is o accountability.